Is Containers Kubernetes MCP Server safe to use?

Containers Kubernetes MCP Server has an HVTrust score of 76.5/100 (Grade B), ranked #81 of 1283 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Containers Kubernetes MCP Server?

Containers Kubernetes MCP Server scores 76.5/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 1.9k GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

Containers Kubernetes MCP Server

containers/kubernetes-mcp-server

Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Kubernetes and OpenShift

MCP Servers Go Grade B Listed Apache-2.0

76.5/100

Rank #81 of 1283

Compare Containers Kubernetes MCP Server

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade B · 3/5 signals

Last push

2026-08-11 · 1d ago

Recent change

New

Is Containers Kubernetes MCP Server safe? Containers Kubernetes MCP Server scores 76.5/100 (Grade B), ranked #81 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-11. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#9 Notion MCP Server — 80.7 (A) → #10 LinkedIn MCP Server — 77.1 (B) → #12 Ha MCP — 76.5 (B) → #13 Bright Data MCP — 75.2 (B) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.

Recent Changes

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #77

Maintainer Checklist

Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Containers Kubernetes MCP Server View MCP Servers Report missing data

78.0

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#11

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-12

Activity & Reach

Stars

1.9k

Forks

411

Last Push

2026-08-11

yesterday

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

4,894

pypi

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

was #81

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

76.5 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Containers Kubernetes MCP Server MCP Servers average (761 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

12.5 / 25

7.5 above avg 5.0

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

18.0 / 18

4.7 above avg 13.3

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

8.5 / 17

in line with avg 8.8

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

18.7 / 20

6.3 above avg 12.4

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

12.8 / 20

7.0 above avg 5.8

Activity Inputs

78.0 / 100

StarsRepository reach

19.7 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.9 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

21.2 / 25

CommunityFork signal

12.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

Verified

npm attestation

OSSF Scorecard

—

Not available

Signed Commits

100%

of last 100 commits verified

Is Containers Kubernetes MCP Server safe?

Public supply-chain signals for Containers Kubernetes MCP Server are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but Containers Kubernetes MCP Server carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.

Does Containers Kubernetes MCP Server publish package provenance?

Yes. Containers Kubernetes MCP Server's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.

Does Containers Kubernetes MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for Containers Kubernetes MCP Server. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.

Is Containers Kubernetes MCP Server actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).

What license does Containers Kubernetes MCP Server use?

Containers Kubernetes MCP Server ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Containers Kubernetes MCP Server's commits signed?

100% of the last 100 commits to Containers Kubernetes MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Containers Kubernetes MCP Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain Containers Kubernetes MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Containers Kubernetes MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #77

GitHub → PyPI: kubernetes-mcp-server npm: kubernetes-mcp-server

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/containers-kubernetes-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/containers-kubernetes-mcp-server)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/containers-kubernetes-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/containers-kubernetes-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON