updated 2026-09-04 23:12 UTC

Containers Kubernetes MCP Server

containers/kubernetes-mcp-server

Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Kubernetes and OpenShift

MCP Servers Go Grade A Listed Apache-2.0
86.1/100
Rank #49 of 1320
Compare Containers Kubernetes MCP Server

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-09-04 · 0d ago
Recent change
Scorecard +4

Is Containers Kubernetes MCP Server safe? Containers Kubernetes MCP Server scores 86.1/100 (Grade A), ranked #49 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.6/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-04. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#12 Enquire MCP — 86.6 (A) → #13 Safari MCP — 86.2 (A) → #15 KiCad MCP Pro — 85.6 (A) → #16 Better Email MCP — 85.1 (A) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Improve adoption to lift the weakest part of the trust profile.
Recent Changes
2026-09-01
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.8/10
2026-09-01
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → A
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank rose 74 spots (#127 → #53)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.6/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Containers Kubernetes MCP Server View MCP Servers Report missing data
76.6
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#14
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade A reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-04 23:12 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars
2.1k
Forks
430
Last Push
2026-09-04
today
Commits (4 wk)
35
Downloads (7d)
10,949
npm+pypi
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
52
Rank Change
▼2
was #47

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

86.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Containers Kubernetes MCP Server MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
18.2 / 25
8.6 above avg 9.6
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.6 above avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.4 / 17
0.6 above avg 11.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
18.2 / 20
6.0 above avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
13.3 / 20
7.0 above avg 6.3

Activity Inputs

76.6 / 100
StarsRepository reach
19.9 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
19.4 / 25
CommunityFork signal
12.3 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
npm attestation
OSSF Scorecard
4.6 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 3, 2026
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 9
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 0
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 2

Is Containers Kubernetes MCP Server safe?

Public supply-chain signals for Containers Kubernetes MCP Server are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but Containers Kubernetes MCP Server carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.
Does Containers Kubernetes MCP Server publish package provenance?
Yes. Containers Kubernetes MCP Server's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does Containers Kubernetes MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Containers Kubernetes MCP Server has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.6/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Containers Kubernetes MCP Server actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Containers Kubernetes MCP Server use?
Containers Kubernetes MCP Server ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Containers Kubernetes MCP Server's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to Containers Kubernetes MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Containers Kubernetes MCP Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Containers Kubernetes MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Containers Kubernetes MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 3Listed 1HVTrust 1Grade 1Scorecard 1
2026-09-01
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.8/10
2026-09-01
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → A
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank rose 74 spots (#127 → #53)
2026-09-01
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 10.1pts (76.0 → 86.1)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#110 → #127)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#88 → #98)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #77
GitHub → PyPI: kubernetes-mcp-server npm: kubernetes-mcp-server

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 86.1 Grade A
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/containers-kubernetes-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/containers-kubernetes-mcp-server)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/containers-kubernetes-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/containers-kubernetes-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON