updated 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC

Easyeda MCP Pro

oaslananka/easyeda-mcp-pro

MCP server for EasyEDA Pro: PCB inspection, BOM sourcing, manufacturing export, and AI-assisted hardware review.

MCP Servers TypeScript Grade C Listed MIT
57.1/100
Rank #382 of 1283
Compare Easyeda MCP Pro

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-10 · 2d ago
Recent change
Rank +1

Is Easyeda MCP Pro safe? Easyeda MCP Pro scores 57.1/100 (Grade C), ranked #382 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 7.6/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-10. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#126 Blender MCP — 57.3 (C) → #127 Sauce Api MCP — 57.1 (C) → #129 Windows MCP — 56.8 (C) → #130 Perplexity MCP Server — 56.3 (C) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Expose more independent signals, such as package metadata, provenance, or public usage evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#360 → #381)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #357
Maintainer Checklist
Keep signals current Trust posture is already in a healthy range. The main job is to keep provenance, maintenance, and public evidence fresh.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Easyeda MCP Pro View MCP Servers Report missing data
63.5
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#128
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC · Repo last pushed 2 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-12

Activity & Reach

Stars
33
Forks
8
Last Push
2026-08-10
2 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
160
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
5
Rank Change
=
was #382

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

57.1 / 100 · 67.0% confidence

Easyeda MCP Pro MCP Servers average (761 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
22.0 / 25
17.0 above avg 5.0
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.7 above avg 13.3
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
15.0 / 17
6.2 above avg 8.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
19.9 / 20
7.5 above avg 12.4
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
3.7 / 20
2.1 below avg 5.8

Activity Inputs

63.5 / 100
StarsRepository reach
9.2 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.7 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
4.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
npm attestation
OSSF Scorecard
7.6 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 8, 2026
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified
Code-Review 0
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Maintained 0
Security-Policy 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Token-Permissions 10
Binary-Artifacts 10
Pinned-Dependencies 10
CII-Best-Practices 7
Signed-Releases 10
Vulnerabilities 10
SAST 10
License 10
Packaging 10
Fuzzing 10
Branch-Protection 4
Contributors 0
CI-Tests 0

Is Easyeda MCP Pro safe?

Easyeda MCP Pro has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Easyeda MCP Pro publish package provenance?
Yes. Easyeda MCP Pro's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does Easyeda MCP Pro have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Easyeda MCP Pro has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 7.6/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Easyeda MCP Pro actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 2 day(s).
What license does Easyeda MCP Pro use?
Easyeda MCP Pro ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Easyeda MCP Pro's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to Easyeda MCP Pro are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Easyeda MCP Pro appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Easyeda MCP Pro?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Easyeda MCP Pro from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Listed 1Rank 1
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#360 → #381)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #357
GitHub → npm: easyeda-mcp-pro

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 57.1 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/easyeda-mcp-pro.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/easyeda-mcp-pro)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/easyeda-mcp-pro"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/easyeda-mcp-pro.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON