Easyeda MCP Pro

MCP server for EasyEDA Pro, connecting AI agents to schematic and PCB workflows, controlled design operations, DRC, BOM sourcing, board analysis, and manufacturing export—with profile-gated tools and safety controls.

MCP Servers TypeScript Listed MIT

Is Easyeda MCP Pro safe? Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.

OSSF Scorecard 9 / 10
Provenance Attested
Signed commits 100%
Last push yesterday
Advisories None known
Compare Easyeda MCP Pro
Suggest a correction

In detail: Easyeda MCP Pro scores 89.6/100 (Grade A), ranked #35 of 1387 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 9/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; no published advisory affects its latest release (easyeda-mcp-pro); last pushed 2026-11-10. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Easyeda MCP Pro and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Signed

    github.com/oaslananka/easyeda-mcp-pro, MIT, last pushed 2026-11-10. 100% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature, so changes trace to a verified account.

  2. Review and release Strong

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 9.0/10 (scanned Nov 10, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review7
    • Branch Protection4
    • Signed Releases10
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions10
    • Pinned Dependencies10
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 4
    CI-Tests 10
    CII-Best-Practices 7
    Code-Review 7
    Contributors 0
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 10
    Fuzzing 10
    License 10
    Maintained 10
    Packaging 10
    Pinned-Dependencies 10
    SAST 10
    Security-Policy 10
    Signed-Releases 10
    Token-Permissions 10
    Vulnerabilities 10
  3. Published packages Linked and attested

    • npm easyeda-mcp-pro Source link points back to this repo Build provenance attested
  4. What you install today No known advisories

    Latest release checked: easyeda-mcp-pro 1.13.1. No published advisory affects it (OSV, checked 2026-11-10).

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-11-02 License changed from NOASSERTION to MIT
  • 2026-09-23 Package provenance attestation detected
  • 2026-09-16 License changed from MIT to NOASSERTION

Evidence behind this score

Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Easyeda MCP Pro’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How Easyeda MCP Pro compares in MCP Servers

  1. #7 Firecrawl MCP Server 89.7 +0.1
  2. #8 Apify MCP Server 89.7 +0.1
  3. #9 Easyeda MCP Pro 89.6 this agent
  4. #10 Containers Kubernetes MCP Server 89.6 ±0
  5. #11 SearXNG Search 88.9 −0.7

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Easyeda MCP Pro’s 89.6.

Where the 89.6 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

89.6 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Easyeda MCP Pro MCP Servers average (779 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
23.8 / 25
13.0 above avg 10.8
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.3 above avg 13.7
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
16.1 / 17
3.8 above avg 12.3
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
19.9 / 20
7.6 above avg 12.3
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
9.2 / 20
1.6 above avg 7.6

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Improve adoption to lift the weakest part of the trust profile.
Recent Changes
2026-11-02
License Changed
License changed from NOASSERTION to MIT
2026-10-20
Rank Moved
Rank rose 15 spots (#59 → #44)
2026-10-16
Rank Moved
Rank rose 10 spots (#64 → #54)
Maintainer Checklist
Keep signals current Trust posture is already in a healthy range. The main job is to keep provenance, maintenance, and public evidence fresh.
Compare with another agent
View MCP Servers Report missing data
66.9
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#9

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade A reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-11-11 00:08 UTC · Repo last pushed yesterday

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-11-10

Activity & Reach

Stars
69
Forks
17
Last Push
2026-11-10
yesterday
Commits (4 wk)
252
Downloads (7d)
4,067
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
12
Rank Change
▼1
was #34

Analysis

Activity Inputs

66.9 / 100
StarsRepository reach
11.1 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
5.8 / 20

Common questions about Easyeda MCP Pro

Public supply-chain signals for Easyeda MCP Pro are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but Easyeda MCP Pro carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.
Does Easyeda MCP Pro publish package provenance?
Yes. Easyeda MCP Pro's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does Easyeda MCP Pro have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Easyeda MCP Pro has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 9/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Easyeda MCP Pro actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Easyeda MCP Pro use?
Easyeda MCP Pro ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Easyeda MCP Pro's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to Easyeda MCP Pro are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Easyeda MCP Pro appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Easyeda MCP Pro's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected

Maintain Easyeda MCP Pro?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Easyeda MCP Pro from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 20HVTrust 2Grade 2License 2Delisted 1Listed 1Provenance 1MCP 1Surface 1Surface 1
2026-11-02
License Changed
License changed from NOASSERTION to MIT
2026-10-20
Rank Moved
Rank rose 15 spots (#59 → #44)
2026-10-16
Rank Moved
Rank rose 10 spots (#64 → #54)
2026-10-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#61 → #73)
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → A
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 539 spots (#608 → #69)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 52.3pts (33.5 → 85.8)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #608
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-16
License Changed
License changed from MIT to NOASSERTION
2026-09-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 18 spots (#81 → #63)
2026-09-07
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → A
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank rose 583 spots (#646 → #63)
2026-09-07
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 28.9pts (56.7 → 85.6)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#623 → #646)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 72 spots (#551 → #623)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#537 → #551)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 32 spots (#505 → #537)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#487 → #505)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#453 → #483)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 18 spots (#471 → #453)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#449 → #471)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 42 spots (#392 → #434)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#373 → #393)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 16 spots (#388 → #372)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#375 → #388)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 17 spots (#391 → #374)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#378 → #391)

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 89.6 Grade A
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/easyeda-mcp-pro.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/easyeda-mcp-pro)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/easyeda-mcp-pro"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/easyeda-mcp-pro.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON