Easyeda MCP Pro vs Firecrawl MCP Server
Both are Grade A and 0.1 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Easyeda MCP Pro leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency; Firecrawl MCP Server leads on adoption.
MCP server for EasyEDA Pro, connecting AI agents to schematic and PCB workflows, controlled design operations, DRC, BOM sourcing, board analysis, and manufacturing export—with profile-gated tools and safety controls.
Choose Easyeda MCP Pro if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.
- +4.4Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 84%
- +2.3Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 9.0 against 6.2
Official Firecrawl MCP server, the context API for AI agents: search, scrape, and interact with the web, plus parse, crawl, map, Agent and Monitor, from any MCP client.
Choose Firecrawl MCP Server if adoption matters most.
- +7.1Adoption: 158.3k weekly downloads against 4.1k
Where they differ
2 dimensions identical: Identity 18.0 · Maintenance 19.9 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Easyeda MCP Pro and Firecrawl MCP Server, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | Easyeda MCP Prooaslananka/easyeda-mcp-pro | Firecrawl MCP Serverfirecrawl/firecrawl-mcp-server |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 89.6 | 89.7 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #35 | #33 |
| Rank in MCP Servers | #9 | #7 |
| GitHub stars | 69 | 7.8k |
| Last updated | 1d ago | 1d ago |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 9.0 / 10 | 6.2 / 10 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Downloads | 4k/wk | 158k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 23.8 | 19.4 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 16.1 | 13.8 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.9 | 19.9 |
| Adoption / 20 | 9.2 | 16.3 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | 1 — Anthropic | 2 — Firecrawl, Google Gemini |
| Requires API keys | Yes | Yes |
| Plugin surface | plugins | — |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →