Mobile MCP
Model Context Protocol Server for Mobile Automation and Scraping (iOS, Android, Emulators, Simulators and Real Devices)
Is Mobile MCP safe? Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.
Compare Mobile MCP
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: Mobile MCP scores 92.9/100 (Grade A), ranked #5 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 7.6/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-23. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Mobile MCP compares in MCP Servers
- #1 Codebase Memory MCP 94.0 +1.1
- #2 Mobile MCP 92.9 this agent
- #3 Playwright MCP 91.6 −1.3
- #4 LinkedIn MCP Server 89.1 −3.8
- #5 Supabase MCP Server 88.9 −4.0
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Mobile MCP’s 92.9.
Where the 92.9 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
92.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceMobile MCP MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade A reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
84.0 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about Mobile MCP
Does Mobile MCP publish package provenance?
Does Mobile MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Mobile MCP actively maintained?
What license does Mobile MCP use?
Are Mobile MCP's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
Compare Mobile MCP head-to-head
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to Mobile MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain Mobile MCP?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Mobile MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mobile-mcp)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mobile-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mobile-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON