Registry › Compare › Mobile MCP vs Playwright MCP

Mobile MCP vs Playwright MCP

Both are Grade A and 0.8 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Mobile MCP leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency; Playwright MCP leads on adoption.

A Mobile MCP 91.9

Mobile MCP: let AI agents drive your iOS and Android apps. MCP server for simulators, emulators and real devices. Works with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and any MCP client.

mobile-next/mobile-mcp · #13 overall · #3 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Mobile MCP if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+1.4Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 7.5 against 6.4
+1.0Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.5 against 6.4
+0.5Maintenance

A Playwright MCP 92.7

Playwright MCP server

microsoft/playwright-mcp · #10 overall · #2 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Playwright MCP if adoption matters most.

+4.0Adoption: 10.1M weekly downloads against 55.9k

Where they differ

21.9

Safety / IntegrityMobile MCP +1.4

20.5

14.9

TransparencyMobile MCP +1.0

13.9

18.1

MaintenanceMobile MCP +0.5

17.6

16.0

AdoptionPlaywright MCP +4.0

20.0

+3.0

Runtime calibrationMobile MCP +0.3

+2.7

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Mobile MCP and Playwright MCP, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Mobile MCPmobile-next/mobile-mcp	Playwright MCPmicrosoft/playwright-mcp
HVTrust score	91.9	92.7
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#13	#10
Rank in MCP Servers	#3	#2
GitHub stars	10.5k	39.5k
Last updated	4d ago	1d ago
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	7.5 / 10	6.4 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	Apache-2.0
Downloads	56k/wk	10.1M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	21.9	20.5
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	14.9	13.9
Maintenance / 20	18.1	17.6
Adoption / 20	16.0	20.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	1 — Anthropic	—
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Mobile MCP profile Playwright MCP profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →