Registry › Compare › Containers Kubernetes MCP Server vs Easyeda MCP Pro

Containers Kubernetes MCP Server vs Easyeda MCP Pro

Both score 89.7/100, so choose on what you weigh most. Containers Kubernetes MCP Server leads on adoption; Easyeda MCP Pro leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency.

A Containers Kubernetes MCP Server 89.7

Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Kubernetes and OpenShift

containers/kubernetes-mcp-server · #35 overall · #8 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Containers Kubernetes MCP Server if adoption matters most.

+5.3Adoption: 69k weekly downloads against 4.1k

A Easyeda MCP Pro 89.7

MCP server for EasyEDA Pro, connecting AI agents to schematic and PCB workflows, controlled design operations, DRC, BOM sourcing, board analysis, and manufacturing export—with profile-gated tools and safety controls.

oaslananka/easyeda-mcp-pro · #33 overall · #6 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Easyeda MCP Pro if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+4.3Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 9.0 against 5.6
+2.8Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 9.0 against 5.6

Where they differ

19.5

Safety / IntegrityEasyeda MCP Pro +4.3

23.8

13.3

TransparencyEasyeda MCP Pro +2.8

16.1

14.5

AdoptionContainers Kubernetes MCP Server +5.3

9.2

+4.4

Runtime calibrationContainers Kubernetes MCP Server +1.8

+2.6

2 dimensions identical: Identity 18.0 · Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Containers Kubernetes MCP Server and Easyeda MCP Pro, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Containers Kubernetes MCP Servercontainers/kubernetes-mcp-server	Easyeda MCP Prooaslananka/easyeda-mcp-pro
HVTrust score	89.7	89.7
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#35	#33
Rank in MCP Servers	#8	#6
GitHub stars	2.2k	68
Last updated	today	today
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	5.6 / 10	9.0 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	MIT
Downloads	69k/wk	4k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	19.5	23.8
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	13.3	16.1
Maintenance / 20	20.0	20.0
Adoption / 20	14.5	9.2
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	—	1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys	No	Yes
Plugin surface	—	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Containers Kubernetes MCP Server profile Easyeda MCP Pro profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →