Registry › Compare › Containers Kubernetes MCP Server vs Mobile MCP

Containers Kubernetes MCP Server vs Mobile MCP

Both are Grade A and 2.4 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Containers Kubernetes MCP Server leads on maintenance; Mobile MCP leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency.

A Containers Kubernetes MCP Server 89.7

Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Kubernetes and OpenShift

containers/kubernetes-mcp-server · #35 overall · #8 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Containers Kubernetes MCP Server if maintenance matters most.

+1.6Maintenance: last push today, against 3d ago

A Mobile MCP 92.1

Mobile MCP: let AI agents drive your iOS and Android apps. MCP server for simulators, emulators and real devices. Works with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and any MCP client.

mobile-next/mobile-mcp · #13 overall · #3 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Mobile MCP if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+2.4Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 7.5 against 5.6
+1.6Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.5 against 5.6
+1.5Adoption: 10.4k GitHub stars against 2.2k

Where they differ

19.5

Safety / IntegrityMobile MCP +2.4

21.9

13.3

TransparencyMobile MCP +1.6

14.9

20.0

MaintenanceContainers Kubernetes MCP Server +1.6

18.4

14.5

AdoptionMobile MCP +1.5

16.0

+4.4

Runtime calibrationContainers Kubernetes MCP Server +1.5

+2.9

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Containers Kubernetes MCP Server and Mobile MCP, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Containers Kubernetes MCP Servercontainers/kubernetes-mcp-server	Mobile MCPmobile-next/mobile-mcp
HVTrust score	89.7	92.1
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#35	#13
Rank in MCP Servers	#8	#3
GitHub stars	2.2k	10.4k
Last updated	today	3d ago
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	5.6 / 10	7.5 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	Apache-2.0
Downloads	69k/wk	56k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	19.5	21.9
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	13.3	14.9
Maintenance / 20	20.0	18.4
Adoption / 20	14.5	16.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	—	1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	—	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Containers Kubernetes MCP Server profile Mobile MCP profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →