Registry › Compare › Containers Kubernetes MCP Server vs Playwright MCP

Containers Kubernetes MCP Server vs Playwright MCP

Both are Grade A and 2.9 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Containers Kubernetes MCP Server leads on maintenance; Playwright MCP leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption.

A Containers Kubernetes MCP Server 89.7

Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Kubernetes and OpenShift

containers/kubernetes-mcp-server · #35 overall · #8 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Containers Kubernetes MCP Server if maintenance matters most.

+2.6Maintenance

A Playwright MCP 92.6

Playwright MCP server

microsoft/playwright-mcp · #11 overall · #2 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Playwright MCP if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.

+5.5Adoption: 10.2M weekly downloads against 69k
+1.0Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 6.4 against 5.6
+0.6Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.4 against 5.6

Where they differ

19.5

Safety / IntegrityPlaywright MCP +1.0

20.5

13.3

TransparencyPlaywright MCP +0.6

13.9

20.0

MaintenanceContainers Kubernetes MCP Server +2.6

17.4

14.5

AdoptionPlaywright MCP +5.5

20.0

+4.4

Runtime calibrationContainers Kubernetes MCP Server +1.6

+2.8

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Containers Kubernetes MCP Server and Playwright MCP, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Containers Kubernetes MCP Servercontainers/kubernetes-mcp-server	Playwright MCPmicrosoft/playwright-mcp
HVTrust score	89.7	92.6
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#35	#11
Rank in MCP Servers	#8	#2
GitHub stars	2.2k	39.4k
Last updated	today	today
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	5.6 / 10	6.4 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	Apache-2.0
Downloads	69k/wk	10.2M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	19.5	20.5
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	13.3	13.9
Maintenance / 20	20.0	17.4
Adoption / 20	14.5	20.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	—	—
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	—	—
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Containers Kubernetes MCP Server profile Playwright MCP profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →