Registry › Compare › Apify MCP Server vs Containers Kubernetes MCP Server

Apify MCP Server vs Containers Kubernetes MCP Server

Both score 89.7/100, so choose on what you weigh most. Apify MCP Server leads on adoption.

A Apify MCP Server 89.7

The Apify MCP server enables your AI agents to extract data from social media, search engines, maps, e-commerce sites, or any other website using thousands of ready-made scrapers, crawlers, and automation tools available on the Apify Store.

apify/apify-mcp-server · #36 overall · #9 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Apify MCP Server if adoption matters most.

+1.7Adoption: 15.5k GitHub stars against 2.2k

A Containers Kubernetes MCP Server 89.7

Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Kubernetes and OpenShift

containers/kubernetes-mcp-server · #35 overall · #8 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Containers Kubernetes MCP Server doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

Where they differ

19.4

Safety / IntegrityContainers Kubernetes MCP Server +0.1

19.5

13.2

TransparencyContainers Kubernetes MCP Server +0.1

13.3

19.9

MaintenanceContainers Kubernetes MCP Server +0.1

20.0

16.2

AdoptionApify MCP Server +1.7

14.5

+3.0

Runtime calibrationContainers Kubernetes MCP Server +1.4

+4.4

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Apify MCP Server and Containers Kubernetes MCP Server, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Apify MCP Serverapify/apify-mcp-server	Containers Kubernetes MCP Servercontainers/kubernetes-mcp-server
HVTrust score	89.7	89.7
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#36	#35
Rank in MCP Servers	#9	#8
GitHub stars	15.5k	2.2k
Last updated	1d ago	today
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	5.5 / 10	5.6 / 10
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Downloads	41k/wk	69k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	19.4	19.5
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	13.2	13.3
Maintenance / 20	19.9	20.0
Adoption / 20	16.2	14.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	—	—
Requires API keys	Yes	No
Plugin surface	—	—
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Apify MCP Server profile Containers Kubernetes MCP Server profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →