Containers Kubernetes MCP Server vs Firecrawl MCP Server
Both score 89.7/100, so choose on what you weigh most. Firecrawl MCP Server leads on transparency and adoption.
Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Kubernetes and OpenShift
Containers Kubernetes MCP Server doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.
Official Firecrawl MCP server, the context API for AI agents: search, scrape, and interact with the web, plus parse, crawl, map, Agent and Monitor, from any MCP client.
Choose Firecrawl MCP Server if transparency and adoption matter most.
- +1.8Adoption: 158.3k weekly downloads against 69k
- +0.5Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.2 against 5.6
Where they differ
2 dimensions identical: Identity 18.0 · Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Containers Kubernetes MCP Server and Firecrawl MCP Server, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | Containers Kubernetes MCP Servercontainers/kubernetes-mcp-server | Firecrawl MCP Serverfirecrawl/firecrawl-mcp-server |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 89.7 | 89.7 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #35 | #34 |
| Rank in MCP Servers | #8 | #7 |
| GitHub stars | 2.2k | 7.8k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.6 / 10 | 6.2 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Downloads | 69k/wk | 158k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 19.5 | 19.4 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.3 | 13.8 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 14.5 | 16.3 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | — | 2 — Firecrawl, Google Gemini |
| Requires API keys | No | Yes |
| Plugin surface | — | — |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →