Is Bolna safe to use?

Bolna has an HVTrust score of 55.1/100 (Grade C), ranked #413 of 1283 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Bolna?

Bolna scores 55.1/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 728 GitHub stars and is categorized under Voice & Conversational.

Bolna

bolna-ai/bolna

Conversational voice AI agents

Voice & Conversational Python Grade C Listed MIT

55.1/100

Rank #413 of 1283

Compare Bolna

How does it stack up against its Voice & Conversational neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade C · 2/5 signals

Last push

2026-08-11 · 0d ago

Recent change

Rank +2

Is Bolna safe? Bolna scores 55.1/100 (Grade C), ranked #413 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.5/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-11. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Voice & Conversational

#4 TEN Framework — 61.0 (C) → #5 Rasa — 59.9 (C) → #7 Call Center AI — 48.0 (D) → #8 Leon — 39.8 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#396 → #414)

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 96 spots (#296 → #392)

2026-08-07

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 4.5/10

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.5/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Compare with LiveKit Agents Get email alerts for Bolna View Voice & Conversational Report missing data

74.6

Activity sub-score · out of 100

In Voice & Conversational

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Activity & Reach

Stars

728

Forks

334

Last Push

2026-08-11

today

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▲1

was #414

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Voice & Conversational

55.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Bolna Voice & Conversational average (11 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

10.6 / 25

1.8 above avg 8.8

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

1.3 below avg 12.1

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

12.3 / 17

0.6 above avg 11.7

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

18.6 / 20

1.9 above avg 16.7

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

6.9 / 20

4.3 below avg 11.2

Activity Inputs

74.6 / 100

StarsRepository reach

17.2 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

25.0 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

20.7 / 25

CommunityFork signal

11.7 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

4.5 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 11, 2026

Signed Commits

100%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 6

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 10

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow 0

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 9

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Is Bolna safe?

Bolna has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does Bolna publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Bolna. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Bolna have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Bolna has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.5/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Bolna actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).

What license does Bolna use?

Bolna ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Bolna's commits signed?

100% of the last 100 commits to Bolna are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Compare Bolna head-to-head

Bolna vs LiveKit Agents → Bolna vs Pipecat → Bolna vs AstrBot →

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

None detected

No MCP server signal detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

6 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

database

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain Bolna?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Bolna from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#396 → #414)

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 96 spots (#296 → #392)

2026-08-07

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 4.5/10

2026-08-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#434 → #445)

2026-07-28

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #429

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/bolna.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/bolna)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/bolna"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/bolna.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Voice & Conversational

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON