TEN Framework

Open-source framework for conversational voice AI agents

Voice & Conversational Python Grade C Listed NOASSERTION
60.5/100
Rank #323 of 1308
Compare TEN Framework

How does it stack up against its Voice & Conversational neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-24 · 1d ago
Recent change
Rank +2

Is TEN Framework safe? TEN Framework scores 60.5/100 (Grade C), ranked #323 of 1308 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.0/10; 99% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-24. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Voice & Conversational

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#313 → #324)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 14 spots (#321 → #307)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#303 → #323)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.0/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
81.5
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#5

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-25 11:32 UTC · Repo last pushed yesterday

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-25

Activity & Reach

Stars
11.1k
Forks
1.4k
Last Push
2026-08-24
yesterday
Commits (4 wk)
25
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
163
Rank Change
▲1
was #324

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Voice & Conversational

60.5 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

TEN Framework Voice & Conversational average (12 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
11.2 / 25
2.6 above avg 8.6
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
1.8 below avg 12.6
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.8 / 17
1.3 above avg 11.5
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
17.6 / 20
0.6 above avg 17.0
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
9.7 / 20
1.2 below avg 10.8

Activity Inputs

81.5 / 100
StarsRepository reach
24.3 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
17.6 / 25
CommunityFork signal
14.6 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
5.0 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 24, 2026
Signed Commits
99%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 9
Branch-Protection 5
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 8
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 10
License 9
Maintained 10
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 7
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is TEN Framework safe?

TEN Framework has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does TEN Framework publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for TEN Framework. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does TEN Framework have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
TEN Framework has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.0/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is TEN Framework actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does TEN Framework use?
TEN Framework ships under NOASSERTION. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are TEN Framework's commits signed?
99% of the last 100 commits to TEN Framework are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Compare TEN Framework head-to-head

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Extensions
Extension based plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain TEN Framework?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores TEN Framework from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 16Score 1HVTrust 1Grade 1Scorecard 1
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#313 → #324)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 14 spots (#321 → #307)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#303 → #323)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 19 spots (#324 → #305)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#313 → #324)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#298 → #311)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 17 spots (#315 → #298)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#297 → #315)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 72 spots (#219 → #291)
2026-07-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#194 → #206)
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#168 → #194)
2026-06-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#153 → #168)
2026-06-19
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 5.0/10
2026-06-19
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-06-19
Rank Moved
Rank rose 84 spots (#222 → #138)
2026-06-19
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 35.5pts (25.0 → 60.5)
2026-06-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#174 → #191)
2026-06-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#162 → #174)
2026-05-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#152 → #163)
2026-05-28
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 13pts (64 → 77)

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 60.5 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/ten-framework.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/ten-framework)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/ten-framework"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/ten-framework.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Voice & Conversational

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON