Is Pipecat safe to use?

Pipecat has an HVTrust score of 84.0/100 (Grade A), ranked #50 of 1308 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Pipecat?

Pipecat scores 84.0/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 14.7k GitHub stars and is categorized under Voice & Conversational.

Pipecat

pipecat-ai/pipecat

Open Source framework for voice agents, multimodal apps, and realtime AI. Maintained by Daily and the community.

Voice & Conversational Python Grade A Listed BSD-2-Clause

84.0/100

Rank #50 of 1308

Compare Pipecat

How does it stack up against its Voice & Conversational neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade A · 4/5 signals

Last push

2026-08-25 · 0d ago

Recent change

No recent signal change

Is Pipecat safe? Pipecat scores 84.0/100 (Grade A), ranked #50 of 1308 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage A (4 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 6.3/10; recent commits are unsigned; last pushed 2026-08-25. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Voice & Conversational

#1 LiveKit Agents — 91.8 (A) → #3 Qwen Audio Agent — 71.4 (B) → #4 AstrBot — 64.9 (C) → #5 TEN Framework — 60.5 (C) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Increase the share of verified signed commits for clearer maintainer identity.

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 6.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with LiveKit Agents Get email alerts for Pipecat View Voice & Conversational Report missing data

90.8

Activity sub-score · out of 100

In Voice & Conversational

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade A reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage A is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (4 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-25

Activity & Reach

Stars

14.7k

Forks

2.5k

Last Push

2026-08-25

today

Commits (4 wk)

973

Downloads (7d)

265,856

pypi

HN mentions (30d)

Open Issues

Rank Change

▲6

was #56

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Voice & Conversational

84.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Pipecat Voice & Conversational average (12 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

15.4 / 25

6.8 above avg 8.6

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

18.0 / 18

5.4 above avg 12.6

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

13.9 / 17

2.4 above avg 11.5

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

20.0 / 20

3.1 above avg 16.9

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

17.2 / 20

6.3 above avg 10.8

Activity Inputs

90.8 / 100

StarsRepository reach

25.0 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

25.0 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

25 / 25

CommunityFork signal

15.8 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

Verified

pypi attestation

OSSF Scorecard

6.3 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 24, 2026

Signed Commits

—

Unable to query

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 6

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 10

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 10

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 9

Is Pipecat safe?

Public supply-chain signals for Pipecat are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but Pipecat carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.

Does Pipecat publish package provenance?

Yes. Pipecat's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.

Does Pipecat have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Pipecat has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 6.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Pipecat actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).

What license does Pipecat use?

Pipecat ships under BSD-2-Clause. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Compare Pipecat head-to-head

Pipecat vs LiveKit Agents → Pipecat vs Qwen Audio Agent → Pipecat vs AstrBot →

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

None detected

No MCP server signal detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

7 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

database

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain Pipecat?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Pipecat from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-05-29

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 10.3pts (74.6 → 84.9)

2026-05-28

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 25pts (65 → 90)

GitHub → PyPI: pipecat-ai

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/pipecat.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/pipecat)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/pipecat"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/pipecat.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Voice & Conversational

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI · Algolia HN Search API
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON