Registry › Compare › Pipecat vs Qwen Audio Agent

Pipecat vs Qwen Audio Agent

Both are Grade A and 0.4 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Pipecat leads on maintenance and adoption, and rests on broader evidence; Qwen Audio Agent leads on supply-chain integrity.

A Pipecat 87.1

Open Source framework for voice agents, multimodal apps, and realtime AI. Maintained by Daily and the community.

pipecat-ai/pipecat · #73 overall · #2 Voice & Conversational · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Pipecat if maintenance and adoption matter most.

+5.5Adoption: 363.4k weekly downloads against 536
+1.9Maintenance: last push today, against 3d ago
+0.8Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.5 against 6.6
A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3

A Qwen Audio Agent 86.7

A realtime voice runtime that keeps Agents talking, working, and present. Real-time Voice Runtime for AI Agents

QwenAudio/qwen-audio-agent · #80 overall · #3 Voice & Conversational · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Qwen Audio Agent if supply-chain integrity matters most.

+2.3Safety / Integrity: 90% of recent commits signed, against 20%

Where they differ

17.9

Safety / IntegrityQwen Audio Agent +2.3

20.2

14.9

TransparencyPipecat +0.8

14.1

20.0

MaintenancePipecat +1.9

18.1

17.6

AdoptionPipecat +5.5

12.1

-1.3

Runtime calibrationQwen Audio Agent +5.5

+4.2

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Pipecat and Qwen Audio Agent, two Voice & Conversational projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Pipecatpipecat-ai/pipecat	Qwen Audio AgentQwenAudio/qwen-audio-agent
HVTrust score	87.1	86.7
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	A	B
Overall rank	#73	#80
Rank in Voice & Conversational	#2	#3
GitHub stars	17.3k	3.2k
Last updated	today	3d ago
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	7.5 / 10	6.6 / 10
License	BSD-2-Clause	Apache-2.0
Downloads	363k/wk	536/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	17.9	20.2
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	14.9	14.1
Maintenance / 20	20.0	18.1
Adoption / 20	17.6	12.1
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	—	Implemented
External providers	7 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, Groq, …	—
Requires API keys	No	Yes
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Pipecat profile Qwen Audio Agent profile More Voice & Conversational →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →