Registry › Compare › AstrBot vs Pipecat

AstrBot vs Pipecat

Pipecat leads on trust: 85.0/100 (Grade A) against 65.6/100 (Grade B), a 19.4-point gap. Pipecat leads on provenance and adoption, and rests on broader evidence.

B AstrBot 65.6

AI Agent Assistant & development framework that integrates lots of IM platforms, LLMs, plugins and AI feature, and can be your openclaw alternative. ✨

AstrBotDevs/AstrBot · #476 overall · #4 Voice & Conversational · coverage C (2/5)

AstrBot doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

A Pipecat 85.0

Open Source framework for voice agents, multimodal apps, and realtime AI. Maintained by Daily and the community.

pipecat-ai/pipecat · #91 overall · #3 Voice & Conversational · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Pipecat if provenance and adoption matter most.

  • +7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
  • +6.3Adoption
  • +4.6Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 6.3 against 5.5
  • +0.7Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.3 against 5.5

Where they differ

11.8
Safety / IntegrityPipecat +4.6
16.4
10.8
Identity / ProvenancePipecat +7.2
18.0
13.2
TransparencyPipecat +0.7
13.9
11.1
AdoptionPipecat +6.3
17.4
-1.3
Runtime calibrationPipecat +0.6
-0.7

1 dimension identical: Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of AstrBot and Pipecat, two Voice & Conversational projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal AstrBotAstrBotDevs/AstrBot Pipecatpipecat-ai/pipecat
HVTrust score 65.6 85.0
Evidence grade B A
Coverage grade C A
Overall rank #476 #91
Rank in Voice & Conversational #4 #3
GitHub stars 41.6k 16.3k
Last updated today today
Build provenance No Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10 6.3 / 10
License AGPL-3.0 BSD-2-Clause
Downloads — 277k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 11.8 16.4
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.2 13.9
Maintenance / 20 20.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 11.1 17.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server — —
External providers 3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI 7 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, Groq, …
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift — Match
Open in the live compare tool → AstrBot profile Pipecat profile More Voice & Conversational →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →