Bolna vs Rasa
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Bolna and Rasa, two Voice & Conversational projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Rasa leads on trust — 59.8/100 (Grade C) vs 20.8/100 (Grade D), a 39.0-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | Bolnabolna-ai/bolna | RasaRasaHQ/rasa |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 20.8 | 59.8 |
| Evidence grade | D | C |
| Coverage grade | D | A |
| Overall rank | #445 | #222 |
| Rank in Voice & Conversational | #8 | #5 |
| GitHub stars | 722 | 21.3k |
| Last updated | today | 11d ago |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | — | 5.2 / 10 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | — | 69k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 5.0 | 6.5 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 8.5 | 12.9 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 18.7 | 11.3 |
| Adoption / 20 | 6.9 | 16.8 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | — |
| External providers | 6 — ElevenLabs, Google Gemini, Groq, … | 3 — Amazon Bedrock, Postgres, Redis |
| Requires API keys | Yes | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | plugins |
| Provenance drift | — | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →