Bolna vs Qwen Audio Agent
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Bolna and Qwen Audio Agent, two Voice & Conversational projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Qwen Audio Agent leads on trust — 71.2/100 (Grade B) vs 55.4/100 (Grade C), a 15.8-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | Bolnabolna-ai/bolna | Qwen Audio AgentQwenAudio/qwen-audio-agent |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 55.4 | 71.2 |
| Evidence grade | C | B |
| Coverage grade | C | B |
| Overall rank | #417 | #132 |
| Rank in Voice & Conversational | #7 | #3 |
| GitHub stars | 736 | 2.2k |
| Last updated | 3d ago | 2d ago |
| Build provenance | No | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 4.5 / 10 | — |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | — | 1k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 10.6 | 9.6 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 12.3 | 8.5 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 18.6 | 19.9 |
| Adoption / 20 | 6.9 | 12.2 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | Declared |
| External providers | 6 — ElevenLabs, Google Gemini, Groq, … | — |
| Requires API keys | Yes | Yes |
| Plugin surface | — | — |
| Provenance drift | — | Match |
Open in the live compare tool →
Bolna profile
Qwen Audio Agent profile
More Voice & Conversational →
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →