Registry › Compare › Bolna vs Qwen Audio Agent

Bolna vs Qwen Audio Agent

Qwen Audio Agent leads on trust: 86.3/100 (Grade A) against 58.0/100 (Grade C), a 28.3-point gap. Qwen Audio Agent leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance, and rests on broader evidence.

C Bolna 58.0

Conversational voice AI agents

bolna-ai/bolna · #726 overall · #8 Voice & Conversational · coverage C (2/5)

Bolna doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

A Qwen Audio Agent 86.3

A realtime voice runtime that keeps Agents talking, working, and present. Real-time Voice Runtime for AI Agents

QwenAudio/qwen-audio-agent · #75 overall · #2 Voice & Conversational · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Qwen Audio Agent if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+7.5Safety / Integrity: package provenance attested, against none
+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+4.5Adoption: 2.9k GitHub stars against 787
+0.8Maintenance

Where they differ

11.8

Safety / IntegrityQwen Audio Agent +7.5

19.3

10.8

Identity / ProvenanceQwen Audio Agent +7.2

18.0

19.0

MaintenanceQwen Audio Agent +0.8

19.8

7.0

AdoptionQwen Audio Agent +4.5

11.5

-3.8

Runtime calibrationQwen Audio Agent +8.3

+4.5

1 dimension identical: Transparency 13.2 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Bolna and Qwen Audio Agent, two Voice & Conversational projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Bolnabolna-ai/bolna	Qwen Audio AgentQwenAudio/qwen-audio-agent
HVTrust score	58.0	86.3
Evidence grade	C	A
Coverage grade	C	B
Overall rank	#726	#75
Rank in Voice & Conversational	#8	#2
GitHub stars	787	2.9k
Last updated	today	1d ago
Build provenance	No	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	5.5 / 10	5.5 / 10
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Downloads	—	259/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	11.8	19.3
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	18.0
Transparency / 17	13.2	13.2
Maintenance / 20	19.0	19.8
Adoption / 20	7.0	11.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	—	Implemented
External providers	6 — ElevenLabs, Google Gemini, Groq, …	—
Requires API keys	Yes	Yes
Plugin surface	—	—
Provenance drift	—	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Bolna profile Qwen Audio Agent profile More Voice & Conversational →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →