Odysseus

Self-hosted AI workspace.

UI & App Builders Python Listed AGPL-3.0

Is Odysseus safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 7.8 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 28%
Last push yesterday
Compare Odysseus
Suggest a correction

In detail: Odysseus scores 67.3/100 (Grade B), ranked #435 of 1378 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 7.8/10; 28% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-10-16. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

What Odysseus can reach, and who runs it

Checked 2026-10-09, each with its source. PUBLISHER is the company's or project's own statement, which we haven't verified; CHECKED is something we observed ourselves. These facts describe the product. They don't change its score.

What it can reach

  • PUBLISHER A self-hosted workspace whose agents can use local or API models, tools, MCP, files and a shell. github.com

Security practice

  • PUBLISHER Its README advises keeping authentication on, setting LOCALHOST_BYPASS=false outside local development, and not exposing raw model or service ports publicly. github.com
  • CHECKED The repository has a SECURITY.md and GitHub private vulnerability reporting is enabled. github.com

How Odysseus could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Odysseus and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/odysseus-dev/odysseus, AGPL-3.0, last pushed 2026-10-16. 28% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Strong

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 7.8/10 (scanned Oct 13, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review7
    • Branch Protection0
    • Signed Releasesn/a
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions10
    • Pinned Dependencies7
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 0
    CI-Tests 10
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 7
    Contributors 10
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 10
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 10
    Packaging 10
    Pinned-Dependencies 7
    SAST 10
    Security-Policy 4
    Signed-Releases -1
    Token-Permissions 10
    Vulnerabilities 10
  3. Published packages None

    No registry package. Odysseus is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.

Changes to this chain

No change to package provenance, package source links, Scorecard coverage or license in HVTracker's daily snapshots of Odysseus.

Evidence behind this score

Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads (missing)
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Odysseus’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How Odysseus compares in UI & App Builders

  1. #6 LibreChat 73.0 +5.7
  2. #7 Cherry Studio 67.4 +0.1
  3. #8 Odysseus 67.3 this agent
  4. #9 Dyad 63.4 −3.9
  5. #10 ToolJet 62.4 −4.9

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Odysseus’s 67.3.

Where the 67.3 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the UI & App Builders average

67.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Odysseus UI & App Builders average (18 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
11.2 / 25
in line with avg 11.1
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.0 below avg 12.8
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
15.1 / 17
2.8 above avg 12.3
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
19.9 / 20
4.3 above avg 15.6
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
11.9 / 20
in line with avg 12.3

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-10-16
Rank Moved
Rank rose 19 spots (#450 → #431)
2026-10-14
Rank Moved
Rank rose 21 spots (#468 → #447)
2026-10-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#462 → #472)
Maintainer Checklist
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
94.7
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#8

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-10-17 20:06 UTC · Repo last pushed yesterday

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-17

Activity & Reach

Stars
93.8k
Forks
1.6k
Last Push
2026-10-16
yesterday
Commits (4 wk)
436
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
14
Open Issues
1125
Rank Change
▼4
was #431

Analysis

Activity Inputs

94.7 / 100
StarsRepository reach
29.8 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
15.0 / 20

Common questions about Odysseus

Odysseus has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Odysseus publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Odysseus. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Odysseus have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Odysseus has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 7.8/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Odysseus actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Odysseus use?
Odysseus ships under AGPL-3.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Odysseus's commits signed?
28% of the last 100 commits to Odysseus are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Compare Odysseus head-to-head

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Declared
MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
  • shell
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Odysseus?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Odysseus from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 31HVTrust 3Score 2Grade 1
2026-10-16
Rank Moved
Rank rose 19 spots (#450 → #431)
2026-10-14
Rank Moved
Rank rose 21 spots (#468 → #447)
2026-10-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#462 → #472)
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#442 → #453)
2026-10-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 100 spots (#344 → #444)
2026-10-07
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 3.4pts (69.6 → 66.2)
2026-10-06
Rank Moved
Rank rose 107 spots (#451 → #344)
2026-10-06
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 3.8pts (65.8 → 69.6)
2026-10-06
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 12pts (82 → 94)
2026-10-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#429 → #439)
2026-10-02
Rank Moved
Rank rose 13 spots (#442 → #429)
2026-09-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#432 → #442)
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 261 spots (#157 → #418)
2026-09-21
Rank Moved
Rank rose 244 spots (#402 → #158)
2026-09-18
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#382 → #395)
2026-09-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#371 → #388)
2026-09-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#350 → #371)
2026-09-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#336 → #350)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#313 → #328)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#283 → #300)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 55 spots (#225 → #280)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank rose 61 spots (#277 → #216)
2026-09-03
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 4.1pts (66.0 → 70.1)
2026-09-02
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank rose 31 spots (#308 → #277)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#284 → #301)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#276 → #288)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#253 → #273)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#238 → #249)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 16 spots (#250 → #234)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#237 → #250)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#228 → #244)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 20 spots (#248 → #228)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#226 → #249)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 41 spots (#182 → #223)
2026-07-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 28 spots (#157 → #185)
2026-07-23
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 14pts (98 → 84)

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 67.3 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/odysseus.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/odysseus)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/odysseus"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/odysseus.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in UI & App Builders

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI · Algolia HN Search API
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON