Is Odysseus safe to use?

Odysseus has an HVTrust score of 64.3/100 (Grade C), ranked #226 of 1204 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Odysseus?

Odysseus scores 64.3/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 85.0k GitHub stars and is categorized under UI & App Builders.

Odysseus

pewdiepie-archdaemon/odysseus

Self-hosted AI workspace.

UI & App Builders Python Grade C Listed AGPL-3.0

64.3/100

Rank #226 of 1204

Compare Odysseus

How does it stack up against its UI & App Builders neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade B · 3/5 signals

Last push

2026-08-08 · 1d ago

Recent change

Rank

Is Odysseus safe? Odysseus scores 64.3/100 (Grade C), ranked #226 of 1204 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 7.2/10; recent commits are unsigned; last pushed 2026-08-08. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in UI & App Builders

#5 LibreChat — 74.2 (B) → #6 Cherry Studio — 64.5 (C) → #8 ToolJet — 61.8 (C) → #9 Dyad — 60.7 (C) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 41 spots (#182 → #223)

2026-07-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 28 spots (#157 → #185)

2026-07-23

Activity Score Changed

Activity score down 14pts (98 → 84)

Maintainer Checklist

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with Neo Get email alerts for Odysseus View UI & App Builders Report missing data

91.0

Activity sub-score · out of 100

In UI & App Builders

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Activity & Reach

Stars

85.0k

Forks

384

Last Push

2026-08-08

yesterday

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

Open Issues

956

Rank Change

▼3

was #223

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs UI & App Builders

64.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Odysseus UI & App Builders average (17 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

9.0 / 25

1.1 below avg 10.1

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

1.7 below avg 12.5

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

14.6 / 17

2.7 above avg 11.9

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

19.7 / 20

3.8 above avg 15.9

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

11.8 / 20

0.6 below avg 12.4

Activity Inputs

91.0 / 100

StarsRepository reach

29.6 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.9 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

24.4 / 25

CommunityFork signal

12.0 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

7.2 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 9, 2026

Signed Commits

—

Unable to query

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 10

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 10

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 0

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 6

SAST 10

Security-Policy 4

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 10

Vulnerabilities 10

Is Odysseus safe?

Odysseus has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does Odysseus publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Odysseus. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Odysseus have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Odysseus has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 7.2/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Odysseus actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).

What license does Odysseus use?

Odysseus ships under AGPL-3.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Compare Odysseus head-to-head

Odysseus vs Neo → Odysseus vs OpenUI → Odysseus vs Tambo →

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

medium confidence

Declared

MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

medium confidence

1 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Postgres

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

shell

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Odysseus's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-06-19

Provider Removed

Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Anthropic

2026-06-16

Provider Removed

Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: OpenAI

2026-06-05

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-06-05

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, OpenAI, Postgres

2026-06-05

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → declared

Maintain Odysseus?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Odysseus from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 41 spots (#182 → #223)

2026-07-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 28 spots (#157 → #185)

2026-07-23

Activity Score Changed

Activity score down 14pts (98 → 84)

2026-07-14

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#136 → #146)

2026-07-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#123 → #136)

2026-07-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#105 → #121)

2026-06-20

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 25 spots (#71 → #96)

2026-06-20

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust down 4.7pts (71.6 → 66.9)

2026-06-19

Provider Removed

Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Anthropic

2026-06-18

Rank Moved

Rank rose 16 spots (#86 → #70)

2026-06-18

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 3.2pts (68.4 → 71.6)

2026-06-16

License Changed

License changed from MIT to AGPL-3.0

2026-06-16

Provider Removed

Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: OpenAI

2026-06-15

License Changed

License changed from AGPL-3.0 to MIT

2026-06-13

License Changed

License changed from MIT to AGPL-3.0

2026-06-11

License Changed

License changed from AGPL-3.0 to MIT

2026-06-10

License Changed

License changed from MIT to AGPL-3.0

2026-06-10

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → B

2026-06-10

Rank Moved

Rank rose 24 spots (#110 → #86)

2026-06-10

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 4.4pts (63.7 → 68.1)

2026-06-05

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-06-05

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, OpenAI, Postgres

2026-06-05

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → declared

2026-06-05

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 4.1/10

2026-06-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 17 spots (#167 → #184)

2026-06-01

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #167

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/odysseus.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/odysseus)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/odysseus"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/odysseus.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in UI & App Builders

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI · Algolia HN Search API
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON