Open WebUI
User-friendly AI Interface (Supports Ollama, OpenAI API, ...)
Is Open WebUI safe? Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.
Compare Open WebUI
How does it stack up against its UI & App Builders neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: Open WebUI scores 84.9/100 (Grade A), ranked #92 of 1371 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage A (4 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.9/10; 74% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-10-09. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Open WebUI could raise its score
Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.
- Raise the OSSF Scorecard from 5.9 to 9.0lowest checks: CII-Best-Practices 0, Fuzzing 0, Pinned-Dependencies 0 +6.4 → 91.3 A · #1 of 18
- Sign every commit74% signed today +1.3 → 86.2 A · #3 of 18
Chain of custody
Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Open WebUI and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.
-
Source Partly signed
github.com/open-webui/open-webui, NOASSERTION, last pushed 2026-10-09. 74% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.
-
Review and release Mixed
OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 5.9/10 (scanned Sep 20, 2026, refresh pending). The checks that decide who can get a change released:
- Code Review7
- Branch Protection3
- Signed Releasesn/a
- Dangerous Workflow10
- Token Permissions0
- Pinned Dependencies0
All 18 Scorecard checks
Binary-Artifacts 9Branch-Protection 3CI-Tests 5CII-Best-Practices 0Code-Review 7Contributors 10Dangerous-Workflow 10Dependency-Update-Tool 10Fuzzing 0License 9Maintained 10Packaging 10Pinned-Dependencies 0SAST 5Security-Policy 10Signed-Releases -1Token-Permissions 0Vulnerabilities 0 -
Published packages Partly attested
- npm open-webui No source link declared No build attestation
- PyPI open-webui Source link isn't a GitHub repo Build provenance attested
Changes to this chain
No change to package provenance, package source links, Scorecard coverage or license in HVTracker's daily snapshots of Open WebUI.
Evidence behind this score
Coverage A: 4 of 5 independent evidence types found.
- GitHub repository data
- Package downloads
- Supply-chain checks
- Public actions (missing)
- Community mentions
Verify this score yourself
Every build re-issues Open WebUI’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.
What this score doesn’t check
It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.
How Open WebUI compares in UI & App Builders
- #1 Neo 89.5 +4.6
- #2 OpenUI 87.7 +2.8
- #3 Open WebUI 84.9 this agent
- #4 Tambo 80.8 −4.1
- #5 CopilotKit 80.8 −4.1
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Open WebUI’s 84.9.
Where the 84.9 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the UI & App Builders average
84.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceOpen WebUI UI & App Builders average (18 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade A reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage A is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (4 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
100.0 / 100Common questions about Open WebUI
Does Open WebUI publish package provenance?
Does Open WebUI have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Open WebUI actively maintained?
What license does Open WebUI use?
Are Open WebUI's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
Compare Open WebUI head-to-head
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- browser
- database
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to Open WebUI's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain Open WebUI?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Open WebUI from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/open-webui)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/open-webui"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/open-webui.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in UI & App Builders
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI · Algolia HN Search API
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON