Is CopilotKit safe?
CopilotKit scores 49.9/100 (Grade D), ranked #238 of 328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types).
The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found;
no OSSF Scorecard result yet;
68% of recent commits are signed;
last pushed 2026-07-11. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
Quick Trust Read
Verdict
Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
49.9/100 · Grade D
Strongest Signal
Maintenance
20.0/20
Weakest Signal
Safety / Integrity
3.4/25
What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Recent Changes
2026-06-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#227 → #257)
2026-06-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#208 → #227)
2026-06-21
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#189 → #199)
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverageExpose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
Publish provenanceAdd package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Signals refreshed2026-07-11 04:00 UTC·Repo last pushed today
Rank Trend
2026-07-052026-07-11
Activity & Reach
Stars
35.9k
Forks
4.4k
Last Push
2026-07-11
today
Commits (4 wk)
1944
Downloads (7d)
356,613
npm
HN mentions (30d)
0
Open Issues
329
Rank Change
▼1
was #237
Analysis
HVTrust Dimensions
49.9 / 100 · 75.0% confidence
Safety / IntegrityOSSF, provenance, signatures
3.4 / 25
Identity / ProvenanceListing and build link
10.8 / 18
TransparencyLicense and public checks
8.5 / 17
MaintenanceFreshness and commits
20.0 / 20
AdoptionStars and downloads
18.3 / 20
Activity Inputs
94.3 / 100
StarsRepository reach
27.3 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
17.0 / 20
Supply Chain Trust
Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
—
Not available
Signed Commits
68%
of last 100 commits verified
Is CopilotKit safe?
Public trust evidence for CopilotKit is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does CopilotKit publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for CopilotKit. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does CopilotKit have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for CopilotKit. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is CopilotKit actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does CopilotKit use?
CopilotKit ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are CopilotKit's commits signed?
68% of the last 100 commits to CopilotKit are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
CopilotKit appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Credential signal:
No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
browser
code
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed
Detected changes to CopilotKit's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-05-24
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected
Maintain CopilotKit?
HVTrust scores CopilotKit from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · Algolia HN Search API
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON
