Cherry Studio vs Odysseus
Both are Grade B and 4.0 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Odysseus leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency, and rests on broader evidence.
Your AI workspace for models, agents, and productivity.
Cherry Studio doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.
Self-hosted AI workspace.
Choose Odysseus if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.
- +2.3Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 7.9 against 6.0
- +1.6Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.9 against 6.0
- +0.7Adoption: 95.5k GitHub stars against 53.4k
- B vs CEvidence coverage: 3 of 5 independent signal types, against 2
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Cherry Studio and Odysseus, two UI & App Builders projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | Cherry StudioCherryHQ/cherry-studio | Odysseusodysseus-dev/odysseus |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 67.1 | 71.1 |
| Evidence grade | B | B |
| Coverage grade | C | B |
| Overall rank | #454 | #346 |
| Rank in UI & App Builders | #8 | #7 |
| GitHub stars | 53.4k | 95.5k |
| Last updated | today | 1d ago |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.0 / 10 | 7.9 / 10 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Downloads | — | — |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 12.5 | 14.8 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.6 | 15.2 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 19.9 |
| Adoption / 20 | 11.3 | 12.0 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Declared |
| External providers | 6 — Anthropic, DeepSeek, Firecrawl, … | 1 — Postgres |
| Requires API keys | No | Yes |
| Plugin surface | extensions | plugins |
| Provenance drift | — | — |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →