Cherry Studio vs Odysseus
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Cherry Studio and Odysseus, two UI & App Builders projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Cherry Studio leads on trust — 64.5/100 (Grade C) vs 64.1/100 (Grade C), a 0.4-point gap. Note: Cherry Studio's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage C vs B) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | Cherry StudioCherryHQ/cherry-studio | Odysseuspewdiepie-archdaemon/odysseus |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 64.5 | 64.1 |
| Evidence grade | C | C |
| Coverage grade | C | B |
| Overall rank | #223 | #229 |
| Rank in UI & App Builders | #6 | #7 |
| GitHub stars | 50.1k | 85.0k |
| Last updated | today | 1d ago |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 4.6 / 10 | 7.1 / 10 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Downloads | — | — |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 10.8 | 8.9 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 12.4 | 14.5 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 19.7 |
| Adoption / 20 | 11.3 | 11.8 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Declared |
| External providers | 6 — Anthropic, DeepSeek, Firecrawl, … | 1 — Postgres |
| Requires API keys | No | Yes |
| Plugin surface | plugins | plugins |
| Provenance drift | — | — |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →