Registry › Compare › Neo vs Odysseus

Neo vs Odysseus

Neo leads on trust: 90.3/100 (Grade A) against 70.0/100 (Grade B), a 20.3-point gap. Neo leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance; Odysseus leads on transparency.

A Neo 90.3

Neo.mjs is a self-evolving software organism: a professional end-to-end AI engineering team whose cross-model swarm inhabits live apps via Neural Link, Active Hybrid GraphRAG, DreamService, and self-healing loops.

neomjs/neo · #23 overall · #1 UI & App Builders · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Neo if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+6.9Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 79%
+2.0Adoption

B Odysseus 70.0

Self-hosted AI workspace.

odysseus-dev/odysseus · #370 overall · #7 UI & App Builders · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Odysseus if transparency matters most.

+1.1Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.9 against 6.6

Where they differ

20.7

Safety / IntegrityNeo +6.9

13.8

18.0

Identity / ProvenanceNeo +7.2

10.8

14.1

TransparencyOdysseus +1.1

15.2

13.9

AdoptionNeo +2.0

11.9

+3.7

Runtime calibrationNeo +5.3

-1.6

1 dimension identical: Maintenance 19.9 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Neo and Odysseus, two UI & App Builders projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Neoneomjs/neo	Odysseusodysseus-dev/odysseus
HVTrust score	90.3	70.0
Evidence grade	A	B
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#23	#370
Rank in UI & App Builders	#1	#7
GitHub stars	3.3k	94.9k
Last updated	1d ago	1d ago
Build provenance	Yes	No
OSSF Scorecard	6.6 / 10	7.9 / 10
License	MIT	AGPL-3.0
Downloads	12k/wk	—
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	20.7	13.8
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	10.8
Transparency / 17	14.1	15.2
Maintenance / 20	19.9	19.9
Adoption / 20	13.9	11.9
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Declared
External providers	—	1 — Postgres
Requires API keys	No	Yes
Plugin surface	plugins	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	—

Open in the live compare tool → Neo profile Odysseus profile More UI & App Builders →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →