Agno
Build, run, and manage agent platforms.
Compare Agno
How does it stack up against its Agent Frameworks neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.
Is Agno safe? Agno scores 86.4/100 (Grade A), ranked #37 of 1308 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage A (4 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.7/10; 99% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-25. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
Ranked neighbours in Agent Frameworks
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade A reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage A is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (4 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
HVTrust Dimensions vs Agent Frameworks
86.4 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceAgno Agent Frameworks average (119 agents)
Activity Inputs
92.1 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Is Agno safe?
Does Agno publish package provenance?
Does Agno have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Agno actively maintained?
What license does Agno use?
Are Agno's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
Compare Agno head-to-head
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- Amazon Bedrock
- Anthropic
- Brave Search
- Browserbase
- Cohere
- ElevenLabs
- Firecrawl
- Google Gemini
- Groq
- Mistral AI
- Multi-provider (LiteLLM)
- OpenAI
- Pinecone
- Postgres
- Qdrant
- Redis
- Tavily
- Weaviate
- browser
- code
- database
- search
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to Agno's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain Agno?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Agno from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/agno)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/agno"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/agno.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in Agent Frameworks
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI · Algolia HN Search API
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON