Is Threadplane safe to use?

Threadplane has an HVTrust score of 79.2/100 (Grade B), ranked #63 of 468 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Threadplane?

Threadplane scores 79.2/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 79 GitHub stars and is categorized under Agent Frameworks.

Threadplane

cacheplane/angular-agent-framework

Angular SDK for Building Agentic Apps + Generative UI

Agent Frameworks TypeScript Grade B Listed MIT

79.2/100

Rank #63 of 468

Compare Threadplane

How does it stack up against its Agent Frameworks neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade B · 3/5 signals

Last push

2026-07-13 · 24d ago

Recent change

Grade Changed

Is Threadplane safe? Threadplane scores 79.2/100 (Grade B), ranked #63 of 468 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 7.8/10; 99% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-07-13. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Agent Frameworks

#10 OpenAI Agents SDK — 83.8 (A) → #11 CrewAI — 81.1 (A) → #13 Deep Agents — 78.8 (B) → #14 LangChain — 77.7 (B) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Improve adoption to lift the weakest part of the trust profile.

Recent Changes

2026-08-05

Grade Changed

Trust grade A → B

Maintainer Checklist

Keep signals current Trust posture is already in a healthy range. The main job is to keep provenance, maintenance, and public evidence fresh.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Threadplane View Agent Frameworks Report missing data

60.3

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#12

In Agent Frameworks

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-07-05 2026-08-06

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-07-13

24 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

npm+pypi

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼1

was #62

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Agent Frameworks

79.2 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Threadplane Agent Frameworks average (103 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

22.2 / 25

13.2 above avg 9.0

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

18.0 / 18

6.3 above avg 11.7

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

15.1 / 17

3.1 above avg 12.0

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

17.7 / 20

3.1 above avg 14.6

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

5.8 / 20

6.1 below avg 11.9

Activity Inputs

60.3 / 100

StarsRepository reach

11.4 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

21.7 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

22.9 / 25

CommunityFork signal

4.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

Verified

npm attestation

OSSF Scorecard

7.8 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 5, 2026

Signed Commits

99%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 3

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 5

Code-Review 9

Contributors 3

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 10

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 7

SAST 10

Security-Policy 10

Signed-Releases 10

Token-Permissions 10

Vulnerabilities 0

Is Threadplane safe?

Public supply-chain signals for Threadplane are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but Threadplane carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.

Does Threadplane publish package provenance?

Yes. Threadplane's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.

Does Threadplane have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Threadplane has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 7.8/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Threadplane actively maintained?

Maintained. Last push was 24 days ago.

What license does Threadplane use?

Threadplane ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Threadplane's commits signed?

99% of the last 100 commits to Threadplane are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

None detected

No MCP server signal detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

3 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

2 tags

Broad capability areas detected.

browser
database

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

medium confidence

Partial

Some package metadata matches; some source metadata is missing

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain Threadplane?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Threadplane from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-08-05

Grade Changed

Trust grade A → B

2026-06-20

Grade Changed

Trust grade B → A

2026-06-19

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #40

GitHub → PyPI: threadplane-middleware npm: @threadplane/chat

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/threadplane.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/threadplane)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/threadplane"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/threadplane.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Frameworks

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON