LangGraph

Build resilient agents.

Agent Frameworks Python Grade A Listed MIT
92.9/100
Rank #4 of 1308
Compare LangGraph

Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade A · 4/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-19 · 0d ago
Recent change
No recent signal change

Is LangGraph safe? LangGraph scores 92.9/100 (Grade A), ranked #4 of 1308 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage A (4 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 7.0/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-19. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Agent Frameworks

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Improve transparency to lift the weakest part of the trust profile.
Recent Changes
2026-08-07
Drift Warning Cleared
Provenance drift warning cleared (now: partial)
Maintainer Checklist
Keep signals current Trust posture is already in a healthy range. The main job is to keep provenance, maintenance, and public evidence fresh.
90.6
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#3

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade A reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage A is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (4 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-19 05:32 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-19

Activity & Reach

Stars
40.0k
Forks
6.7k
Last Push
2026-08-19
today
Commits (4 wk)
41
Downloads (7d)
17,526,330
npm+pypi
HN mentions (30d)
16
Open Issues
457
Rank Change
=
was #4

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Agent Frameworks

92.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

LangGraph Agent Frameworks average (119 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
21.2 / 25
13.1 above avg 8.1
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
6.4 above avg 11.6
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
14.4 / 17
2.9 above avg 11.5
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
18.5 / 20
4.1 above avg 14.4
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
20.0 / 20
8.7 above avg 11.3

Activity Inputs

90.6 / 100
StarsRepository reach
27.6 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
20.2 / 25
CommunityFork signal
17.8 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
npm attestation
OSSF Scorecard
7.0 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 18, 2026
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 4
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 9
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 8
SAST 10
Security-Policy 9
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is LangGraph safe?

Public supply-chain signals for LangGraph are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but LangGraph carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.
Does LangGraph publish package provenance?
Yes. LangGraph's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does LangGraph have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
LangGraph has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 7.0/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is LangGraph actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does LangGraph use?
LangGraph ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are LangGraph's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to LangGraph are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Compare LangGraph head-to-head

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
medium confidence
Partial
Some package metadata matches; some source metadata is missing
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to LangGraph's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-07
Drift Warning Cleared
Provenance drift warning cleared (now: partial)
2026-06-05
Drift Warning Raised
Package-provenance drift warning: package metadata no longer clearly points at this repo
2026-05-24
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected

Maintain LangGraph?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores LangGraph from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Scorecard 1Provenance 1Rank 1Score 1HVTrust 1Drift 1Drift 1
2026-08-07
Drift Warning Cleared
Provenance drift warning cleared (now: partial)
2026-06-05
Drift Warning Raised
Package-provenance drift warning: package metadata no longer clearly points at this repo
2026-05-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 9.9pts (82.0 → 91.9)
2026-05-28
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 25pts (70 → 94)
2026-05-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#21 → #40)
2026-05-24
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected
2026-05-24
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 6.8/10

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 92.9 Grade A
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/langgraph.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/langgraph)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/langgraph"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/langgraph.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Frameworks

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI · Algolia HN Search API
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON