RegistryCompare › Haystack vs LangGraph

Haystack vs LangGraph

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Haystack and LangGraph, two Agent Frameworks projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Haystack leads on trust — 94.0/100 (Grade A) vs 84.5/100 (Grade A), a 9.5-point gap. Note: Haystack's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types. Full breakdown below.
Signal Haystackdeepset-ai/haystack LangGraphlangchain-ai/langgraph
HVTrust score 94.0 84.5
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B A
Overall rank #2 #41
Rank in Agent Frameworks #2 #8
GitHub stars 26.1k 38.9k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 9.4 / 10 6.9 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 244k/wk 17.5M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 24.2 21.1
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 16.5 14.4
Maintenance / 20 20.0 17.4
Adoption / 20 17.8 20.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared
External providers 5 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Azure OpenAI, … 2 — Postgres, Redis
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Match Warning
Open in the live compare tool → Haystack profile LangGraph profile More Agent Frameworks →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →