Registry › Compare › Agno vs Threadplane

Agno vs Threadplane

Both are Grade A and 0.7 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Agno leads on adoption and rests on broader evidence; Threadplane leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency.

A Agno 87.0

The self-driving agent platform

agno-agi/agno · #76 overall · #9 Agent Frameworks · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Agno if adoption matters most.

+8.6Adoption: 514.9k weekly downloads against 1.3k
A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3

A Threadplane 86.3

The open-source thread-plane for agents: chat, durable threads, persistence, human approvals, and generative UI for Angular, on LangGraph and AG-UI.

cacheplane/threadplane · #84 overall · #10 Agent Frameworks · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Threadplane if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+3.8Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 96%
+2.5Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.6 against 4.7

Where they differ

18.2

Safety / IntegrityThreadplane +3.8

22.0

12.5

TransparencyThreadplane +2.5

15.0

18.7

AdoptionAgno +8.6

10.1

-0.4

Runtime calibrationThreadplane +1.6

+1.2

2 dimensions identical: Identity 18.0 · Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agno and Threadplane, two Agent Frameworks projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Agnoagno-agi/agno	Threadplanecacheplane/threadplane
HVTrust score	87.0	86.3
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	A	B
Overall rank	#76	#84
Rank in Agent Frameworks	#9	#10
GitHub stars	43.1k	285
Last updated	today	today
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	4.7 / 10	7.6 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	MIT
Downloads	515k/wk	1k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	18.2	22.0
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	12.5	15.0
Maintenance / 20	20.0	20.0
Adoption / 20	18.7	10.1
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	—
External providers	18 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Brave Search, …	1 — Redis
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	—	—
Provenance drift	Match	Partial

Open in the live compare tool → Agno profile Threadplane profile More Agent Frameworks →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →