Is Synter Media AI MCP Server safe to use?

Synter Media AI MCP Server has an HVTrust score of 46.1/100 (Grade D), ranked #1035 of 1325 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Synter Media AI MCP Server?

Synter Media AI MCP Server scores 46.1/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 17 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

Synter Media AI MCP Server

Synter-Media-AI/mcp-server

MCP server for AI agents to manage ad campaigns across Google, Meta, LinkedIn, Microsoft, Reddit, TikTok, and more

MCP Servers TypeScript Listed MIT

Is Synter Media AI MCP Server safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10

Provenance None

Signed commits 37%

Last push 4d ago

Compare Synter Media AI MCP Server

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: Synter Media AI MCP Server scores 46.1/100 (Grade D), ranked #1035 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.0/10; 37% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-22. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Synter Media AI MCP Server compares in MCP Servers

#604 Agrobr MCP 46.5 +0.4
#605 Devcontainer MCP 46.4 +0.3
#606 Synter Media AI MCP Server 46.1 this agent
#607 Godot MCP 46.0 −0.1
#608 FocusRelay 45.9 −0.2

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Synter Media AI MCP Server’s 46.1.

Where the 46.1 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

46.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Synter Media AI MCP Server MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

6.8 / 25

3.5 below avg 10.3

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

2.6 below avg 13.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

11.9 / 17

in line with avg 12.2

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

12.9 / 20

0.8 above avg 12.1

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

3.0 / 20

4.2 below avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#1021 → #1032)

2026-09-24

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-24

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.0/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Synter Media AI MCP Server View MCP Servers Report missing data

42.4

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#606

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-09-22

4 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼3

was #1032

Analysis

Activity Inputs

42.4 / 100

StarsRepository reach

7.5 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.4 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

7.5 / 25

CommunityFork signal

2.8 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

4.0 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 19, 2026

Signed Commits

37%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests 3

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 6

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 10

Common questions about Synter Media AI MCP Server

Public trust evidence for Synter Media AI MCP Server is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does Synter Media AI MCP Server publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Synter Media AI MCP Server. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Synter Media AI MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Synter Media AI MCP Server has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.0/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Synter Media AI MCP Server actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 4 day(s).

What license does Synter Media AI MCP Server use?

Synter Media AI MCP Server ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Synter Media AI MCP Server's commits signed?

36% of the last 100 commits to Synter Media AI MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Synter Media AI MCP Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

1 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Anthropic

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Synter Media AI MCP Server's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-24

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-24

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain Synter Media AI MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Synter Media AI MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#1021 → #1032)

2026-09-24

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-24

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

2026-09-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 25 spots (#996 → #1021)

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 433 spots (#563 → #996)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 11.7pts (36.1 → 47.8)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #563

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 26 spots (#1023 → #997)

2026-09-11

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#989 → #1002)

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 34 spots (#947 → #981)

2026-09-06

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 17 spots (#930 → #947)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 51 spots (#879 → #930)

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 32 spots (#847 → #879)

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 107 spots (#740 → #847)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 29 spots (#711 → #740)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 22 spots (#689 → #711)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 41 spots (#648 → #689)

2026-08-30

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 4.0/10

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank rose 522 spots (#1170 → #648)

2026-08-30

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 27.9pts (20.6 → 48.5)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 26 spots (#1144 → #1170)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 19 spots (#1125 → #1144)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 30 spots (#1086 → #1116)

2026-08-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#1068 → #1083)

2026-08-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 16 spots (#1077 → #1061)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 32 spots (#1045 → #1077)

2026-08-15

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#1027 → #1045)

2026-08-14

Rank Moved

Rank rose 26 spots (#1053 → #1027)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 65 spots (#979 → #1044)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #973

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/synter-media-ai-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/synter-media-ai-mcp-server)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/synter-media-ai-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/synter-media-ai-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON