updated 2026-09-04 13:33 UTC

OSS Snowflake MCP Server

Snowflake-Labs/mcp

MCP Server for Snowflake including Cortex AI, object management, SQL orchestration, semantic view consumption, and more

MCP Servers Python Grade C Listed Apache-2.0
53.0/100
Rank #676 of 1320
Compare OSS Snowflake MCP Server

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-05-15 · 112d ago
Recent change
Rank +5

Is OSS Snowflake MCP Server safe? OSS Snowflake MCP Server scores 53.0/100 (Grade C), ranked #676 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.4/10; 97% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-05-15. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#333 Lunch Money — 53.0 (C) → #334 Ble MCP Server — 53.0 (C) → #336 Marlinjai Email MCP — 53.0 (C) → #337 AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server — 53.0 (C) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#662 → #676)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 54 spots (#608 → #662)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 28 spots (#580 → #608)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.4/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 112 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for OSS Snowflake MCP Server View MCP Servers Report missing data
33.8
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#335
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-04 13:33 UTC · Repo last pushed 112 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars
296
Forks
106
Last Push
2026-05-15
112 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
9,360
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
19
Rank Change
▼14
was #662

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

53.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

OSS Snowflake MCP Server MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
9.1 / 25
in line with avg 9.5
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.6 below avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.4 / 17
in line with avg 11.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
4.5 / 20
7.7 below avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
11.2 / 20
5.0 above avg 6.2

Activity Inputs

33.8 / 100
StarsRepository reach
14.8 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
9.4 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
9.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
3.4 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 30, 2026
Signed Commits
97%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 4
CI-Tests 9
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 7
Contributors 3
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 0
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is OSS Snowflake MCP Server safe?

Public trust evidence for OSS Snowflake MCP Server is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does OSS Snowflake MCP Server publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for OSS Snowflake MCP Server. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does OSS Snowflake MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
OSS Snowflake MCP Server has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.4/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is OSS Snowflake MCP Server actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 112 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does OSS Snowflake MCP Server use?
OSS Snowflake MCP Server ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are OSS Snowflake MCP Server's commits signed?
97% of the last 100 commits to OSS Snowflake MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
OSS Snowflake MCP Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to OSS Snowflake MCP Server's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-13
Activity Went Stale
No commits for 90 days

Maintain OSS Snowflake MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores OSS Snowflake MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 9Listed 1Stale 1HVTrust 1Grade 1Scorecard 1
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#662 → #676)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 54 spots (#608 → #662)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 28 spots (#580 → #608)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#557 → #580)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#527 → #557)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 29 spots (#500 → #529)
2026-08-26
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.4/10
2026-08-26
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 255 spots (#740 → #485)
2026-08-26
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 20.8pts (33.5 → 54.3)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#717 → #732)
2026-08-13
Activity Went Stale
No commits for 90 days
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 39 spots (#676 → #715)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #675
GitHub → PyPI: snowflake-labs-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 53.0 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/oss-snowflake-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/oss-snowflake-mcp-server)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/oss-snowflake-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/oss-snowflake-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON