Is MCP Odoo safe to use?

MCP Odoo has an HVTrust score of 36.4/100 (Grade D), ranked #677 of 1283 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for MCP Odoo?

MCP Odoo scores 36.4/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 385 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

MCP Odoo

erpipe-org/mcp-odoo

Odoo MCP for AI agents — 41 tools, gated writes, multi-instance. Free hosted: ERPipe → mcp.erpipe.com

MCP Servers Python Grade D Listed MIT

36.4/100

Rank #677 of 1283

Compare MCP Odoo

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade C · 2/5 signals

Last push

2026-07-29 · 14d ago

Recent change

Rank +1

Is MCP Odoo safe? MCP Odoo scores 36.4/100 (Grade D), ranked #677 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 14% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-07-29. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#294 Keboola MCP Server — 36.5 (D) → #295 Music Studio — 36.5 (D) → #297 Email MCP — 36.3 (D) → #298 Appwrite MCP — 36.1 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.

Recent Changes

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 31 spots (#648 → #679)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #648

Maintainer Checklist

Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for MCP Odoo View MCP Servers Report missing data

67.3

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#296

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-12

Activity & Reach

Stars

385

Forks

179

Last Push

2026-07-29

14 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

1,061

pypi

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▲1

was #678

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

36.4 / 100 · 67.0% confidence

MCP Odoo MCP Servers average (761 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

0.7 / 25

4.3 below avg 5.0

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

2.5 below avg 13.3

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

8.5 / 17

in line with avg 8.8

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

16.9 / 20

4.5 above avg 12.4

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

10.2 / 20

4.4 above avg 5.8

Activity Inputs

67.3 / 100

StarsRepository reach

15.5 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

23.1 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

18.2 / 25

CommunityFork signal

10.5 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

—

Not available

Signed Commits

14%

of last 100 commits verified

Is MCP Odoo safe?

Public trust evidence for MCP Odoo is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does MCP Odoo publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for MCP Odoo. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does MCP Odoo have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for MCP Odoo. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.

Is MCP Odoo actively maintained?

Maintained. Last push was 14 days ago.

What license does MCP Odoo use?

MCP Odoo ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are MCP Odoo's commits signed?

14% of the last 100 commits to MCP Odoo are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

MCP Odoo appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

low confidence

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain MCP Odoo?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores MCP Odoo from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 31 spots (#648 → #679)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #648

GitHub → PyPI: odoo-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-odoo.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-odoo)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-odoo"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-odoo.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON