updated 2026-09-26 06:32 UTC

NotebookLM MCP (PleasePrompto)

PleasePrompto/notebooklm-mcp

MCP server for NotebookLM - Let your AI agents (Claude Code, Codex) research documentation directly with grounded, citation-backed answers from Gemini. Persistent auth, library management, cross-client sharing. Zero hallucinations, just your knowledge base.

MCP Servers TypeScript Needs review MIT

Is NotebookLM MCP (PleasePrompto) safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 1.4 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 0%
Last push 16d ago
Compare NotebookLM MCP (PleasePrompto)

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: NotebookLM MCP (PleasePrompto) scores 53.1/100 (Grade C), ranked #850 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 1.4/10; recent commits are unsigned; last pushed 2026-09-10. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Active listing, but review is needed
  • [5.1] repository is archived

How NotebookLM MCP (PleasePrompto) compares in MCP Servers

  1. #479 Akshare One MCP 53.1 ±0
  2. #480 Elasticsearch MCP Server 53.1 ±0
  3. #481 NotebookLM MCP (PleasePrompto) 53.1 this agent
  4. #482 MCP Sap Docs 53.0 −0.1
  5. #483 Cucumberstudio MCP 53.0 −0.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks NotebookLM MCP (PleasePrompto)’s 53.1.

Where the 53.1 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

53.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

NotebookLM MCP (PleasePrompto) MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
1.7 / 25
8.6 below avg 10.3
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.6 below avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
9.7 / 17
2.5 below avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
12.1 / 20
in line with avg 12.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
12.8 / 20
5.6 above avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-26
Warning Issued
Warning: eligibility issues detected
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#838 → #849)
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 1.4/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Review Flags
[5.1] repository is archived
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for NotebookLM MCP (PleasePrompto) View MCP Servers Report missing data
60.6
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#481
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 06:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 16 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
3.4k
Forks
532
Last Push
2026-09-10
16 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
1
Downloads (7d)
1,742
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
▼1
was #849

Analysis

Activity Inputs

60.6 / 100
StarsRepository reach
21.2 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
22.8 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
3.8 / 25
CommunityFork signal
12.7 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
1.4 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 6, 2026 (refresh pending)
Signed Commits
0%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests 0
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 0
Dangerous-Workflow -1
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 0
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies -1
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions -1
Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about NotebookLM MCP (PleasePrompto)

Public trust evidence for NotebookLM MCP (PleasePrompto) is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does NotebookLM MCP (PleasePrompto) publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for NotebookLM MCP (PleasePrompto). This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does NotebookLM MCP (PleasePrompto) have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
NotebookLM MCP (PleasePrompto) has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 1.4/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is NotebookLM MCP (PleasePrompto) actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 16 days ago.
What license does NotebookLM MCP (PleasePrompto) use?
NotebookLM MCP (PleasePrompto) ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are NotebookLM MCP (PleasePrompto)'s commits signed?
0% of the last 100 commits to NotebookLM MCP (PleasePrompto) are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
NotebookLM MCP (PleasePrompto) appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to NotebookLM MCP (PleasePrompto)'s runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-10
Activity Resumed
Activity resumed

Maintain NotebookLM MCP (PleasePrompto)?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores NotebookLM MCP (PleasePrompto) from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 20HVTrust 3Listed 2Grade 2Warning Issued 2Scorecard 1Score 1Fresh 1Delisted 1MCP 1
2026-09-26
Warning Issued
Warning: eligibility issues detected
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#838 → #849)
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 226 spots (#1066 → #840)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 30.2pts (23.1 → 53.3)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1066
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#793 → #807)
2026-09-10
Activity Resumed
Activity resumed
2026-09-10
Warning Issued
Warning: eligibility issues detected
2026-09-10
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-10
Rank Moved
Rank rose 256 spots (#1049 → #793)
2026-09-10
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 9.3pts (44.7 → 54.0)
2026-09-10
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 22pts (41 → 63)
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#1030 → #1049)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#1018 → #1030)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 36 spots (#982 → #1018)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#970 → #982)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 49 spots (#921 → #970)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#890 → #921)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 53 spots (#837 → #890)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 47 spots (#790 → #837)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 32 spots (#758 → #790)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#723 → #758)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#697 → #723)
2026-08-29
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 1.4/10
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank rose 247 spots (#944 → #697)
2026-08-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 15.1pts (30.6 → 45.7)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#909 → #944)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 28 spots (#881 → #909)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 108 spots (#773 → #881)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#751 → #765)
2026-08-10
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #753
GitHub → npm: notebooklm-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 53.1 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/notebooklm-mcp-pleaseprompto.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/notebooklm-mcp-pleaseprompto)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/notebooklm-mcp-pleaseprompto"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/notebooklm-mcp-pleaseprompto.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON