updated 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC

MCP Abap Abap Adt Api

mario-andreschak/mcp-abap-abap-adt-api

MCP-Server for SAP ABAP wrapping abap-adt-api

MCP Servers TypeScript Grade D Listed MIT
18.2/100
Rank #1152 of 1283
Compare MCP Abap Abap Adt Api

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade D · 1/5 signals
Last push
2026-07-10 · 33d ago
Recent change
Rank +2

Is MCP Abap Abap Adt Api safe? MCP Abap Abap Adt Api scores 18.2/100 (Grade D), ranked #1152 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage D (1 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 20% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-07-10. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#656 Fred MCP Server — 18.2 (D) → #657 YouTube Research MCP — 18.2 (D) → #659 Revolut MCP — 18.2 (D) → #660 Deployhq MCP Server — 18.2 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Recent Changes
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 70 spots (#1083 → #1153)
2026-08-09
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 9pts (52 → 43)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1036
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 33 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for MCP Abap Abap Adt Api View MCP Servers Report missing data
42.3
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#658
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage D is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (1 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC · Repo last pushed 33 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-12

Activity & Reach

Stars
178
Forks
62
Last Push
2026-07-10
33 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
▲2
was #1154

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

18.2 / 100 · 40.0% confidence

MCP Abap Abap Adt Api MCP Servers average (761 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
1.0 / 25
4.0 below avg 5.0
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.5 below avg 13.3
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
8.5 / 17
in line with avg 8.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
9.8 / 20
2.6 below avg 12.4
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
5.4 / 20
in line with avg 5.8

Activity Inputs

42.3 / 100
StarsRepository reach
13.5 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
20.4 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
8.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
—
Not available
Signed Commits
20%
of last 100 commits verified

Is MCP Abap Abap Adt Api safe?

Public trust evidence for MCP Abap Abap Adt Api is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does MCP Abap Abap Adt Api publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for MCP Abap Abap Adt Api. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does MCP Abap Abap Adt Api have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for MCP Abap Abap Adt Api. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is MCP Abap Abap Adt Api actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 33 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does MCP Abap Abap Adt Api use?
MCP Abap Abap Adt Api ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are MCP Abap Abap Adt Api's commits signed?
20% of the last 100 commits to MCP Abap Abap Adt Api are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Declared
MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain MCP Abap Abap Adt Api?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores MCP Abap Abap Adt Api from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Listed 1Score 1Rank 1
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 70 spots (#1083 → #1153)
2026-08-09
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 9pts (52 → 43)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1036
GitHub → npm: mcp-abap-abap-adt-api

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 18.2 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-abap-abap-adt-api.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-abap-abap-adt-api)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-abap-abap-adt-api"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-abap-abap-adt-api.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON