Is Debridge MCP safe to use?

Debridge MCP has an HVTrust score of 48.8/100 (Grade D), ranked #974 of 1325 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Debridge MCP?

Debridge MCP scores 48.8/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 31 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

Debridge MCP

debridge-finance/debridge-mcp

MCP server that gives AI agents the ability to execute cross-chain cryptocurrency swaps and transfers via the deBridge protocol

MCP Servers TypeScript Listed MIT

Is Debridge MCP safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 3.2 / 10

Provenance None

Signed commits 2%

Last push 17d ago

Compare Debridge MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: Debridge MCP scores 48.8/100 (Grade D), ranked #974 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.2/10; 2% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-09. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Debridge MCP compares in MCP Servers

#563 Codex MCP Tool 48.9 +0.1
#564 Dbmcp 48.8 ±0
#565 Debridge MCP 48.8 this agent
#566 Librecrawl — Technical SEO Audit MCP Server 48.8 ±0
#567 MCP Server Infranodus 48.8 ±0

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Debridge MCP’s 48.8.

Where the 48.8 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

48.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Debridge MCP MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

4.1 / 25

6.2 below avg 10.3

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

2.6 below avg 13.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

11.2 / 17

1.0 below avg 12.2

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

10.9 / 20

1.2 below avg 12.1

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

5.8 / 20

1.4 below avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#963 → #974)

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank rose 169 spots (#1128 → #959)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.2/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Debridge MCP View MCP Servers Report missing data

35.4

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#565

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-09-09

17 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

npm

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

was #974

Analysis

Activity Inputs

35.4 / 100

StarsRepository reach

9.0 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

22.6 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

0.0 / 25

CommunityFork signal

3.6 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

3.2 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 19, 2026

Signed Commits

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 0

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 3

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about Debridge MCP

Public trust evidence for Debridge MCP is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does Debridge MCP publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Debridge MCP. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Debridge MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Debridge MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.2/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Debridge MCP actively maintained?

Maintained. Last push was 17 days ago.

What license does Debridge MCP use?

Debridge MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Debridge MCP's commits signed?

2% of the last 100 commits to Debridge MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Debridge MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Debridge MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-08-26

Activity Resumed

Activity resumed

Maintain Debridge MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Debridge MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#963 → #974)

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank rose 169 spots (#1128 → #959)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 27.5pts (21.5 → 49.0)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #1128

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-11

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → D

2026-09-11

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#911 → #925)

2026-09-09

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-08

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → D

2026-09-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#893 → #903)

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 47 spots (#846 → #893)

2026-09-06

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#830 → #846)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 57 spots (#773 → #830)

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 31 spots (#742 → #773)

2026-09-03

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 36 spots (#706 → #742)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank rose 371 spots (#1077 → #706)

2026-09-02

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 16.4pts (33.5 → 49.9)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 44 spots (#1033 → #1077)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 33 spots (#1000 → #1033)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 52 spots (#948 → #1000)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 48 spots (#900 → #948)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 31 spots (#869 → #900)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 26 spots (#843 → #869)

2026-08-26

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 3.2/10

2026-08-26

Activity Resumed

Activity resumed

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank rose 399 spots (#1242 → #843)

2026-08-26

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 17.7pts (16.1 → 33.8)

2026-08-26

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 20pts (17 → 38)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 25 spots (#1209 → #1234)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 72 spots (#1133 → #1205)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #1128

GitHub → npm: @debridge-finance/debridge-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/debridge-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/debridge-mcp)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/debridge-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/debridge-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON