updated 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC

Multica

multica-ai/multica

Assign issues to Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and 17 more coding agents like teammates — open-source and self-hostable.

Multi-Agent Systems Go Grade C Listed NOASSERTION
64.5/100
Rank #241 of 1283
Compare Multica

How does it stack up against its Multi-Agent Systems neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-12 · 0d ago
Recent change
Rank +2

Is Multica safe? Multica scores 64.5/100 (Grade C), ranked #241 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.6/10; 99% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-12. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Multi-Agent Systems

#4 Agency Swarm — 65.4 (B) → #5 Open Multi-Agent — 64.7 (C) → #7 Ruflo — 64.2 (C) → #8 Agency Agents — 62.5 (C) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#215 → #234)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 44 spots (#181 → #225)
2026-08-05
License Changed
License classification changed from source-available to open
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.6/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Compare with AIPass Get email alerts for Multica View Multi-Agent Systems Report missing data
95.4
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#6
In Multi-Agent Systems

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-12

Activity & Reach

Stars
45.5k
Forks
5.8k
Last Push
2026-08-12
today
Commits (4 wk)
645
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
764
Rank Change
=
was #241

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Multi-Agent Systems

64.5 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Multica Multi-Agent Systems average (35 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
10.7 / 25
4.5 above avg 6.2
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
in line with avg 11.2
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.4 / 17
1.4 above avg 11.0
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
20.0 / 20
7.0 above avg 13.0
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
11.2 / 20
1.2 above avg 10.0

Activity Inputs

95.4 / 100
StarsRepository reach
27.9 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
17.5 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
4.6 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 11, 2026
Signed Commits
99%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 5
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 9
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is Multica safe?

Multica has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Multica publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Multica. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Multica have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Multica has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.6/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Multica actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Multica use?
Multica ships under NOASSERTION. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Multica's commits signed?
99% of the last 100 commits to Multica are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Compare Multica head-to-head

Multica vs AIPass → Multica vs Solace Agent Mesh → Multica vs CAMEL →

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Declared
MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Extensions
Extension based plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Multica?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Multica from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 3Listed 1Grade 1License 1
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#215 → #234)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 44 spots (#181 → #225)
2026-08-05
License Changed
License classification changed from source-available to open
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#143 → #160)
2026-07-03
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-06-24
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #136
GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 64.5 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/multica.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/multica)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/multica"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/multica.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Multi-Agent Systems

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON