AIPass

Persistent Agent Workspace — AI agents that remember, collaborate, and never start from zero.

Multi-Agent Systems Python Grade A Listed MIT
Compare → Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
HVTrust
82.0/100 · Grade A
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-07-15 · 0d ago
Recent change
No recent signal change

Is AIPass safe? AIPass scores 82.0/100 (Grade A), ranked #47 of 417 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 7.3/10; 12% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-07-15. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Quick Trust Read

Verdict
Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.
82.0/100 · Grade A
Strongest Signal
Identity / Provenance
18.0/18
Weakest Signal
Adoption
8.7/20
What Would Improve It
Increase the share of verified signed commits for clearer maintainer identity.
Recent Changes
2026-07-04
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Anthropic
Maintainer Checklist
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
71.4
Activity Score · out of 100
82.0
HVTrust Score · out of 100
#47
Global Rank · of 417
#1

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade A reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-07-15 01:30 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Rank Trend

2026-07-05 2026-07-15

Activity & Reach

Stars
238
Forks
33
Last Push
2026-07-15
today
Commits (4 wk)
205
Downloads (7d)
168
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
=
was #47

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions

82.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence
Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
17.2 / 25
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
14.7 / 17
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
20.0 / 20
Adoption60% stars · 40% downloads, log-scaled
8.7 / 20

Activity Inputs

71.4 / 100
StarsRepository reach
14.3 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
7.1 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
pypi attestation
OSSF Scorecard
7.3 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Jul 13, 2026
Signed Commits
12%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 3
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 5
Code-Review 0
Contributors 0
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 3
SAST 10
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases 8
Token-Permissions 10
Vulnerabilities 8

Is AIPass safe?

Public supply-chain signals for AIPass are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but AIPass carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.
Does AIPass publish package provenance?
Yes. AIPass's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does AIPass have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
AIPass has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 7.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is AIPass actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does AIPass use?
AIPass ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are AIPass's commits signed?
12% of the last 100 commits to AIPass are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Compare AIPass head-to-head

Ranked neighbours in Multi-Agent Systems

AI agent surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
medium confidence
Extensions
Extension based plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to AIPass's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-07-04
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Anthropic
2026-06-05
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → extension-based
2026-06-05
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, OpenAI

Maintain AIPass?

HVTrust scores AIPass from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Listed 1HVTrust 1Rank 1Scorecard 1Surface 1Surface 1Surface 1
2026-07-04
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Anthropic
2026-06-05
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → extension-based
2026-06-05
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, OpenAI
2026-05-30
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 6.4/10
2026-05-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 47 spots (#69 → #22)
2026-05-30
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 15.8pts (65.1 → 80.9)
2026-05-29
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #69

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

HVTrust 82.0 Grade A
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/aipass.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/aipass)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/aipass"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/aipass.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Multi-Agent Systems

AIPass head-to-head

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON