AIPass vs OpenMausBot
Both are Grade A and 1.7 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. AIPass leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency; OpenMausBot leads on adoption.
Persistent Agent Workspace — AI agents that remember, collaborate, and never start from zero.
Choose AIPass if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.
- +7.2Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 33%
- +2.6Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.3 against 4.2
Open-source Grok Bot alternative with a virtual machine that bots can use
Choose OpenMausBot if adoption matters most.
- +4.3Adoption: 2.3k weekly downloads against 224
Where they differ
2 dimensions identical: Identity 18.0 · Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of AIPass and OpenMausBot, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | AIPassAIOSAI/AIPass | OpenMausBotmilind-soni/OpenMausBot |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 85.5 | 83.8 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #86 | #107 |
| Rank in Multi-Agent Systems | #1 | #2 |
| GitHub stars | 288 | 4.7k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 7.3 / 10 | 4.2 / 10 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | 224/wk | 2k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 21.6 | 14.4 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 14.7 | 12.1 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 9.0 | 13.3 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | Implemented |
| External providers | 2 — Anthropic, OpenAI | — |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | extensions | — |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →