AIPass vs Multica
AIPass leads on trust: 85.5/100 (Grade A) against 66.0/100 (Grade B), a 19.5-point gap. AIPass leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance, and rests on broader evidence; Multica leads on adoption.
Persistent Agent Workspace — AI agents that remember, collaborate, and never start from zero.
Choose AIPass if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.
- +10.2Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 7.3 against 5.1
- +7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
- +1.9Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.3 against 5.1
- B vs CEvidence coverage: 3 of 5 independent signal types, against 2
Make humans and AI agents work as one team — open-source and self-hostable.
Choose Multica if adoption matters most.
- +2.3Adoption: 52.6k GitHub stars against 288
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of AIPass and Multica, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | AIPassAIOSAI/AIPass | Multicamultica-ai/multica |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 85.5 | 66.0 |
| Evidence grade | A | B |
| Coverage grade | B | C |
| Overall rank | #86 | #469 |
| Rank in Multi-Agent Systems | #1 | #7 |
| GitHub stars | 288 | 52.6k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 7.3 / 10 | 5.1 / 10 |
| License | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Downloads | 224/wk | — |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 21.6 | 11.4 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 14.7 | 12.8 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 9.0 | 11.3 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | Declared |
| External providers | 2 — Anthropic, OpenAI | — |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | extensions | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Match | — |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →