Registry › Compare › Multica vs Open Multi-Agent

Multica vs Open Multi-Agent

Multica leads on trust: 65.8/100 (Grade B) against 60.1/100 (Grade C), a 5.7-point gap. Multica leads on maintenance and adoption; Open Multi-Agent leads on supply-chain integrity.

B Multica 65.8

Make humans and AI agents work as one team — open-source and self-hostable.

multica-ai/multica · #486 overall · #7 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage C (2/5)

Choose Multica if maintenance and adoption matter most.

+2.9Maintenance: last push 1d ago, against 5d ago
+2.2Adoption: 54.6k GitHub stars against 7k

C Open Multi-Agent 60.1

Self-hosted TypeScript agent runtime with durable approvals and verifiable run records. Own it, approve it, audit it.

open-multi-agent/open-multi-agent · #690 overall · #21 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage C (2/5)

Choose Open Multi-Agent if supply-chain integrity matters most.

+0.7Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 5.5 against 5.0

Where they differ

11.2

Safety / IntegrityOpen Multi-Agent +0.7

11.9

12.8

TransparencyOpen Multi-Agent +0.4

13.2

19.9

MaintenanceMultica +2.9

17.0

11.4

AdoptionMultica +2.2

9.2

-0.3

Runtime calibrationMultica +1.7

-2.0

1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Multica and Open Multi-Agent, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Multicamultica-ai/multica	Open Multi-Agentopen-multi-agent/open-multi-agent
HVTrust score	65.8	60.1
Evidence grade	B	C
Coverage grade	C	C
Overall rank	#486	#690
Rank in Multi-Agent Systems	#7	#21
GitHub stars	54.6k	7.0k
Last updated	1d ago	5d ago
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	5.0 / 10	5.5 / 10
License	NOASSERTION	MIT
Downloads	—	—
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	11.2	11.9
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	12.8	13.2
Maintenance / 20	19.9	17.0
Adoption / 20	11.4	9.2
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Declared	Declared
External providers	—	3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI
Requires API keys	No	Yes
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	—	—

Open in the live compare tool → Multica profile Open Multi-Agent profile More Multi-Agent Systems →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →