Ruflo
🌊 The original agent harness. Deploy intelligent multi-player swarms, coordinate autonomous workflows, and build conversational AI systems. Features adaptive memory, self-learning intelligence, federation, vector RAG integration, and native Claude Code / Codex / Hermes and many more Integrated
Is Ruflo safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
Compare Ruflo
How does it stack up against its Multi-Agent Systems neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: Ruflo scores 66.6/100 (Grade B), ranked #419 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.5/10; 64% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-24. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Ruflo compares in Multi-Agent Systems
- #4 CAMEL 68.0 +1.4
- #5 Agency Swarm 67.6 +1.0
- #6 Ruflo 66.6 this agent
- #7 Multica 65.7 −0.9
- #8 Concordia 65.5 −1.1
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Ruflo’s 66.6.
Where the 66.6 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the Multi-Agent Systems average
66.6 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceRuflo Multi-Agent Systems average (38 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
97.4 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about Ruflo
Does Ruflo publish package provenance?
Does Ruflo have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Ruflo actively maintained?
What license does Ruflo use?
Are Ruflo's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
Compare Ruflo head-to-head
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- filesystem
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Maintain Ruflo?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Ruflo from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/ruflo)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/ruflo"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/ruflo.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in Multi-Agent Systems
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON