Is Ruflo safe to use?

Ruflo has an HVTrust score of 64.2/100 (Grade C), ranked #247 of 1283 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Ruflo?

Ruflo scores 64.2/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 67.7k GitHub stars and is categorized under Multi-Agent Systems.

Ruflo

ruvnet/ruflo

🌊 The original agent meta-harness. Deploy intelligent multi-player swarms, coordinate autonomous workflows, and build co

Multi-Agent Systems TypeScript Grade C Listed MIT

64.2/100

Rank #247 of 1283

Compare Ruflo

How does it stack up against its Multi-Agent Systems neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade C · 2/5 signals

Last push

2026-08-11 · 1d ago

Recent change

Rank +1

Is Ruflo safe? Ruflo scores 64.2/100 (Grade C), ranked #247 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.5/10; 19% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-11. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Multi-Agent Systems

#5 Open Multi-Agent — 64.7 (C) → #6 Multica — 64.5 (C) → #8 Agency Agents — 62.5 (C) → #9 Concordia — 62.3 (C) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#221 → #237)

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 42 spots (#177 → #219)

2026-07-30

Rank Moved

Rank rose 18 spots (#208 → #190)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.5/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with AIPass Get email alerts for Ruflo View Multi-Agent Systems Report missing data

97.2

Activity sub-score · out of 100

In Multi-Agent Systems

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-12

Activity & Reach

Stars

67.7k

Forks

8.1k

Last Push

2026-08-11

yesterday

Commits (4 wk)

176

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

561

Rank Change

▼4

was #243

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Multi-Agent Systems

64.2 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Ruflo Multi-Agent Systems average (35 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

7.8 / 25

1.6 above avg 6.2

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

in line with avg 11.2

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

13.2 / 17

2.2 above avg 11.0

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

19.9 / 20

6.9 above avg 13.0

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

11.6 / 20

1.6 above avg 10.0

Activity Inputs

97.2 / 100

StarsRepository reach

29.0 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.9 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

25 / 25

CommunityFork signal

18.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

5.5 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 11, 2026

Signed Commits

19%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 8

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 10

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 1

SAST 10

Security-Policy 10

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Is Ruflo safe?

Ruflo has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does Ruflo publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Ruflo. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Ruflo have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Ruflo has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.5/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Ruflo actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).

What license does Ruflo use?

Ruflo ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Ruflo's commits signed?

19% of the last 100 commits to Ruflo are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Compare Ruflo head-to-head

Ruflo vs AIPass → Ruflo vs Solace Agent Mesh → Ruflo vs CAMEL →

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Ruflo appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

2 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

filesystem

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain Ruflo?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Ruflo from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#221 → #237)

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 42 spots (#177 → #219)

2026-07-30

Rank Moved

Rank rose 18 spots (#208 → #190)

2026-07-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#195 → #208)

2026-07-14

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#169 → #181)

2026-07-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 22 spots (#147 → #169)

2026-06-24

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #147

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/ruflo.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/ruflo)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/ruflo"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/ruflo.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Multi-Agent Systems

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON