CAMEL vs Ruflo
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of CAMEL and Ruflo, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
CAMEL leads on trust — 68.5/100 (Grade B) vs 66.4/100 (Grade B), a 2.1-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | CAMELcamel-ai/camel | Rufloruvnet/ruflo |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 68.5 | 66.4 |
| Evidence grade | B | B |
| Coverage grade | A | C |
| Overall rank | #137 | #165 |
| Rank in Multi-Agent Systems | #3 | #5 |
| GitHub stars | 17.7k | 73.0k |
| Last updated | 1d ago | today |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.9 / 10 | 5.3 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Downloads | 9k/wk | — |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 11.5 | 10.0 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 14.4 | 13.0 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 17.2 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 15.5 | 11.7 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Declared | Implemented |
| External providers | 14 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Cohere, … | 2 — Anthropic, Supabase |
| Requires API keys | Yes | No |
| Plugin surface | — | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Match | — |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →