OpenBot
Open-source AI coworkers that each get a computer of their own: a browser, files and tools, with every action decided before it happens and recorded after. Bring any AG-UI agent.
Is OpenBot safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
Compare OpenBot
How does it stack up against its Multi-Agent Systems neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: OpenBot scores 64.7/100 (Grade C), ranked #521 of 1378 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.5/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-10-16. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How OpenBot could raise its score
Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.
- Raise the OSSF Scorecard from 5.5 to 9.0lowest checks: CII-Best-Practices 0, Fuzzing 0, Maintained 0 +7.2 → 71.9 B · #4 of 43
Chain of custody
Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships OpenBot and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.
-
Source Signed
github.com/CopilotKit/OpenBot, MIT, last pushed 2026-10-16. 100% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature, so changes trace to a verified account.
-
Review and release Mixed
OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 5.5/10 (scanned Oct 12, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:
- Code Review8
- Branch Protection8
- Signed Releases0
- Dangerous Workflow10
- Token Permissions10
- Pinned Dependencies4
All 18 Scorecard checks
Binary-Artifacts 10Branch-Protection 8CI-Tests 6CII-Best-Practices 0Code-Review 8Contributors 10Dangerous-Workflow 10Dependency-Update-Tool 10Fuzzing 0License 10Maintained 0Packaging 10Pinned-Dependencies 4SAST 0Security-Policy 0Signed-Releases 0Token-Permissions 10Vulnerabilities 0 -
Published packages None
No registry package. OpenBot is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.
Changes to this chain
- 2026-10-12 OSSF Scorecard: 5.5/10
Evidence behind this score
Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.
- GitHub repository data
- Package downloads (missing)
- Supply-chain checks
- Public actions (missing)
- Community mentions (missing)
Verify this score yourself
Every build re-issues OpenBot’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.
What this score doesn’t check
It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.
How OpenBot compares in Multi-Agent Systems
- #10 OpenExecutive 65.2 +0.5
- #11 TradingAgents 65.2 +0.5
- #12 OpenBot 64.7 this agent
- #13 CAMEL 64.6 −0.1
- #14 Agency Agents 63.6 −1.1
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks OpenBot’s 64.7.
Where the 64.7 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the Multi-Agent Systems average
64.7 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceOpenBot Multi-Agent Systems average (43 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
86.6 / 100Common questions about OpenBot
Does OpenBot publish package provenance?
Does OpenBot have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is OpenBot actively maintained?
What license does OpenBot use?
Are OpenBot's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- browser
- database
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Maintain OpenBot?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores OpenBot from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/openbot)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/openbot"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/openbot.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in Multi-Agent Systems
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON