Registry › Compare › Multica vs Ruflo

Multica vs Ruflo

Both are Grade B and 1.3 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most.

B Multica 65.8

Make humans and AI agents work as one team — open-source and self-hostable.

multica-ai/multica · #486 overall · #7 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage C (2/5)

Multica doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

B Ruflo 67.1

🌊 The original agent harness. Deploy intelligent multi-player swarms, coordinate autonomous workflows, and build conversational AI systems. Features adaptive memory, self-learning intelligence, federation, vector RAG integration, and native Claude Code / Codex / Hermes and many more Integrated

ruvnet/ruflo · #451 overall · #5 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage C (2/5)

Ruflo doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

Where they differ

11.2

Safety / IntegrityMultica +0.2

11.0

12.8

TransparencyMultica +0.1

12.7

11.4

AdoptionRuflo +0.4

11.8

-0.3

Runtime calibrationRuflo +1.2

+0.9

2 dimensions identical: Identity 10.8 · Maintenance 19.9 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Multica and Ruflo, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Multicamultica-ai/multica	Rufloruvnet/ruflo
HVTrust score	65.8	67.1
Evidence grade	B	B
Coverage grade	C	C
Overall rank	#486	#451
Rank in Multi-Agent Systems	#7	#5
GitHub stars	54.6k	80.7k
Last updated	1d ago	1d ago
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	5.0 / 10	4.9 / 10
License	NOASSERTION	MIT
Downloads	—	—
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	11.2	11.0
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	12.8	12.7
Maintenance / 20	19.9	19.9
Adoption / 20	11.4	11.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Declared	Implemented
External providers	—	2 — Anthropic, Supabase
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	plugins	plugins
Provenance drift	—	—

Open in the live compare tool → Multica profile Ruflo profile More Multi-Agent Systems →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →