updated 2026-09-04 14:33 UTC

MCP Image

shinpr/mcp-image

MCP server for AI image generation and editing with automatic prompt optimization and quality presets. Supports Nano Ban

MCP Servers TypeScript Grade D Listed MIT
22.3/100
Rank #1277 of 1320
Compare MCP Image

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade D · 1/5 signals
Last push
2026-09-04 · 0d ago
Recent change
Rank +6

Is MCP Image safe? MCP Image scores 22.3/100 (Grade D), ranked #1277 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage D (1 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 45% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-04. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#749 Awesome Copilot MCP Server — 22.8 (D) → #750 OpenSTAAD MCP Server — 22.4 (D) → #752 Persistent Project Context for xAI Grok — 22.1 (D) → #753 Starwind UI MCP — 21.7 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Recent Changes
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#1250 → #1276)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#1219 → #1250)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 33 spots (#1186 → #1219)
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for MCP Image View MCP Servers Report missing data
62.9
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#751
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage D is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (1 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-04 14:33 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars
157
Forks
33
Last Push
2026-09-04
today
Commits (4 wk)
25
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
▼1
was #1276

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

22.3 / 100 · 40.0% confidence

MCP Image MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
2.3 / 25
7.2 below avg 9.5
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.6 below avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
8.5 / 17
3.3 below avg 11.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
17.6 / 20
5.4 above avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
5.3 / 20
0.9 below avg 6.2

Activity Inputs

62.9 / 100
StarsRepository reach
13.2 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
17.6 / 25
CommunityFork signal
7.1 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
—
Not available
Signed Commits
45%
of last 100 commits verified

Is MCP Image safe?

Public trust evidence for MCP Image is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does MCP Image publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for MCP Image. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does MCP Image have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for MCP Image. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is MCP Image actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does MCP Image use?
MCP Image ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are MCP Image's commits signed?
45% of the last 100 commits to MCP Image are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
MCP Image appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
2 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain MCP Image?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores MCP Image from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 16Listed 1
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#1250 → #1276)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#1219 → #1250)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 33 spots (#1186 → #1219)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 32 spots (#1154 → #1186)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#1134 → #1154)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#1103 → #1134)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 43 spots (#1060 → #1103)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#1030 → #1060)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 83 spots (#947 → #1030)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#927 → #939)
2026-08-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 21 spots (#948 → #927)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#935 → #954)
2026-08-14
Rank Moved
Rank rose 15 spots (#944 → #929)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#929 → #944)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 14 spots (#943 → #929)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 58 spots (#879 → #937)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #876
GitHub → npm: mcp-image

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 22.3 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-image.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-image)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-image"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-image.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON