updated 2026-09-26 06:32 UTC

MCP Image

shinpr/mcp-image

MCP server for AI image generation and editing with automatic prompt optimization and quality presets. Supports Nano Banana (Gemini), OpenAI GPT Image, and BytePlus Seedream.

MCP Servers TypeScript Listed MIT

Is MCP Image safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 5.7 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 39%
Last push 16d ago
Compare MCP Image

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: MCP Image scores 64.5/100 (Grade C), ranked #486 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.7/10; 39% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-10. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How MCP Image compares in MCP Servers

  1. #278 Korean Law MCP 64.7 +0.2
  2. #279 NetLogo MCP 64.6 +0.1
  3. #280 MCP Image 64.5 this agent
  4. #281 Mapbox MCP Server 64.5 ±0
  5. #282 Claude Faf MCP 64.5 ±0

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks MCP Image’s 64.5.

Where the 64.5 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

64.5 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

MCP Image MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
9.1 / 25
1.2 below avg 10.3
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.6 below avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.3 / 17
1.1 above avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
16.9 / 20
4.8 above avg 12.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
9.9 / 20
2.7 above avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Google Gemini, OpenAI
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.7/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for MCP Image View MCP Servers Report missing data
62.2
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#280
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 06:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 16 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
167
Forks
39
Last Push
2026-09-10
16 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
30
Downloads (7d)
2,536
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
▲4
was #490

Analysis

Activity Inputs

62.2 / 100
StarsRepository reach
13.4 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
22.8 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
18.6 / 25
CommunityFork signal
7.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
5.7 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 20, 2026
Signed Commits
39%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 4
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 0
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 10
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 10

Common questions about MCP Image

MCP Image has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does MCP Image publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for MCP Image. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does MCP Image have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
MCP Image has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.7/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is MCP Image actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 16 days ago.
What license does MCP Image use?
MCP Image ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are MCP Image's commits signed?
39% of the last 100 commits to MCP Image are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
MCP Image appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
2 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to MCP Image's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Google Gemini, OpenAI
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain MCP Image?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores MCP Image from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 22HVTrust 3Listed 2Grade 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1MCP 1Surface 1
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Google Gemini, OpenAI
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 259 spots (#741 → #482)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 34.5pts (30.1 → 64.6)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #741
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#409 → #422)
2026-09-09
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → B
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank rose 673 spots (#1090 → #417)
2026-09-09
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 23.6pts (42.2 → 65.8)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 29 spots (#1059 → #1088)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#1047 → #1059)
2026-09-05
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 5.7/10
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank rose 236 spots (#1283 → #1047)
2026-09-05
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 19.8pts (22.3 → 42.1)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#1250 → #1276)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#1219 → #1250)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 33 spots (#1186 → #1219)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 32 spots (#1154 → #1186)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#1134 → #1154)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#1103 → #1134)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 43 spots (#1060 → #1103)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#1030 → #1060)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 83 spots (#947 → #1030)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#927 → #939)
2026-08-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 21 spots (#948 → #927)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#935 → #954)
2026-08-14
Rank Moved
Rank rose 15 spots (#944 → #929)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#929 → #944)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 14 spots (#943 → #929)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 58 spots (#879 → #937)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #876
GitHub → npm: mcp-image

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 64.5 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-image.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-image)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-image"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-image.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON