MCP Image
MCP server for AI image generation and editing with automatic prompt optimization and quality presets. Supports Nano Banana (Gemini), OpenAI GPT Image, and BytePlus Seedream.
Is MCP Image safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
Compare MCP Image
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: MCP Image scores 65.5/100 (Grade B), ranked #511 of 1374 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.6/10; 48% of recent commits are signed; no published advisory affects its latest release (mcp-image); last pushed 2026-11-05. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How MCP Image could raise its score
Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.
- Publish build provenance for its packagesnpm publish --provenance from CI +14.7 → 80.2 A · #96 of 778
- Raise the OSSF Scorecard from 5.6 to 9.0lowest checks: CII-Best-Practices 0, Code-Review 0, Contributors 0 +7.1 → 72.6 B · #186 of 778
- Sign every commit48% signed today +2.6 → 68.1 B · #248 of 778
Chain of custody
Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships MCP Image and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.
-
Source Partly signed
github.com/shinpr/mcp-image, MIT, last pushed 2026-11-05. 48% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.
-
Review and release Mixed
OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 5.6/10 (scanned Nov 6, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:
- Code Review0
- Branch Protection4
- Signed Releasesn/a
- Dangerous Workflow10
- Token Permissions0
- Pinned Dependencies10
All 18 Scorecard checks
Binary-Artifacts 10Branch-Protection 4CI-Tests 10CII-Best-Practices 0Code-Review 0Contributors 0Dangerous-Workflow 10Dependency-Update-Tool 10Fuzzing 0License 10Maintained 10Packaging -1Pinned-Dependencies 10SAST 0Security-Policy 0Signed-Releases -1Token-Permissions 0Vulnerabilities 8 -
Published packages Linked, not attested
- npm mcp-image Source link points back to this repo No build attestation
Without a build attestation, nothing proves the published files were built from this repository.
-
What you install today No known advisories
Latest release checked: mcp-image 0.19.0. No published advisory affects it (OSV, checked 2026-11-09).
Changes to this chain
- 2026-09-05 OSSF Scorecard: 5.7/10
Evidence behind this score
Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.
- GitHub repository data
- Package downloads
- Supply-chain checks
- Public actions (missing)
- Community mentions (missing)
Verify this score yourself
Every build re-issues MCP Image’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.
What this score doesn’t check
It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.
How MCP Image compares in MCP Servers
- #293 Mailtrap 65.6 +0.1
- #294 Agrobr MCP 65.6 +0.1
- #295 MCP Image 65.5 this agent
- #296 Replicant MCP 65.5 ±0
- #297 Laravel Boost 65.4 −0.1
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks MCP Image’s 65.5.
Where the 65.5 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
65.5 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceMCP Image MCP Servers average (778 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
64.1 / 100Common questions about MCP Image
Does MCP Image publish package provenance?
Does MCP Image have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is MCP Image actively maintained?
What license does MCP Image use?
Are MCP Image's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to MCP Image's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain MCP Image?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores MCP Image from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-image)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-image"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-image.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON