Agrobr MCP

MCP server for Brazilian agricultural data — connect LLMs to 10 public data sources via agrobr

MCP Servers Python Grade D Listed MIT
46.6/100
Rank #866 of 1320
Compare Agrobr MCP

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-03-12 · 176d ago
Recent change
Rank +9

Is Agrobr MCP safe? Agrobr MCP scores 46.6/100 (Grade D), ranked #866 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.4/10; 58% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-03-12. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Improve maintenance to lift the weakest part of the trust profile.
Recent Changes
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#850 → #866)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 51 spots (#799 → #850)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 46 spots (#753 → #799)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.4/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 176 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
13.8
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#466

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-04 13:33 UTC · Repo last pushed 176 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars
27
Forks
8
Last Push
2026-03-12
176 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
20
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
▼16
was #850

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

46.6 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Agrobr MCP MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
14.7 / 25
5.2 above avg 9.5
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.6 above avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.4 / 17
in line with avg 11.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
0.3 / 20
11.9 below avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
5.2 / 20
1.0 below avg 6.2

Activity Inputs

13.8 / 100
StarsRepository reach
8.7 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
0.6 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
4.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
pypi attestation
OSSF Scorecard
3.4 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 2, 2026
Signed Commits
58%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests -1
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 0
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 0
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 10

Is Agrobr MCP safe?

Public trust evidence for Agrobr MCP is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Agrobr MCP publish package provenance?
Yes. Agrobr MCP's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does Agrobr MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Agrobr MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.4/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Agrobr MCP actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 176 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does Agrobr MCP use?
Agrobr MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Agrobr MCP's commits signed?
58% of the last 100 commits to Agrobr MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Implemented
Agrobr MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Warning
1 package source mismatch detected
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Agrobr MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-12
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none

Maintain Agrobr MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Agrobr MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 12Listed 1Surface 1HVTrust 1Scorecard 1
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#850 → #866)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 51 spots (#799 → #850)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 46 spots (#753 → #799)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 29 spots (#724 → #753)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 36 spots (#688 → #724)
2026-08-30
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.4/10
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 140 spots (#828 → #688)
2026-08-30
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 7.2pts (39.8 → 47.0)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 41 spots (#787 → #828)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#756 → #787)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#733 → #756)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 95 spots (#638 → #733)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#603 → #613)
2026-08-12
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#578 → #602)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #571

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 46.6 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/agrobr-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/agrobr-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/agrobr-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/agrobr-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON