Replicant MCP

Android MCP server - production-grade, token-optimized, accessibility-first

MCP Servers TypeScript Grade C Listed MIT
62.7/100
Rank #505 of 1328
Compare Replicant MCP

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-07-26 · 44d ago
Recent change
Rank +9

Is Replicant MCP safe? Replicant MCP scores 62.7/100 (Grade C), ranked #505 of 1328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.5/10; 29% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-07-26. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Increase the share of verified signed commits for clearer maintainer identity.
Recent Changes
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 37 spots (#462 → #499)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#450 → #462)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 71 spots (#379 → #450)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.5/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 44 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
29.6
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#276

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-08 15:33 UTC · Repo last pushed 44 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-08

Activity & Reach

Stars
16
Forks
4
Last Push
2026-07-26
44 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
62
npm
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
▼6
was #499

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

62.7 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Replicant MCP MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
13.3 / 25
3.4 above avg 9.9
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.6 above avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.5 / 17
0.5 below avg 12.0
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
9.1 / 20
3.1 below avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
5.4 / 20
1.5 below avg 6.9

Activity Inputs

29.6 / 100
StarsRepository reach
7.4 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
18.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
3.3 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
npm attestation
OSSF Scorecard
3.5 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 5, 2026
Signed Commits
29%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 3
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 0
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 0
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 3
SAST 0
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is Replicant MCP safe?

Replicant MCP has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Replicant MCP publish package provenance?
Yes. Replicant MCP's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does Replicant MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Replicant MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.5/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Replicant MCP actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 44 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does Replicant MCP use?
Replicant MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Replicant MCP's commits signed?
28% of the last 100 commits to Replicant MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Replicant MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
  • shell
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Replicant MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Replicant MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 14HVTrust 2Listed 1Scorecard 1Grade 1
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 37 spots (#462 → #499)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#450 → #462)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 71 spots (#379 → #450)
2026-09-03
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank rose 553 spots (#923 → #370)
2026-09-03
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 21.0pts (42.3 → 63.3)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 52 spots (#871 → #923)
2026-09-01
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.5/10
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank rose 76 spots (#947 → #871)
2026-09-01
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 4.9pts (37.4 → 42.3)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 32 spots (#915 → #947)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 43 spots (#872 → #915)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 47 spots (#825 → #872)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#800 → #825)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#778 → #800)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 102 spots (#676 → #778)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#654 → #666)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 27 spots (#628 → #655)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #626

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 62.7 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/replicant-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/replicant-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/replicant-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/replicant-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON