Laravel Boost

Laravel-focused MCP server for augmenting your AI powered local development experience.

MCP Servers PHP Grade D Listed MIT
Compare → Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
HVTrust
26.7/100 · Grade D
Evidence coverage
Grade D · 1/5 signals
Last push
2026-07-14 · 1d ago
Recent change
New

Is Laravel Boost safe? Laravel Boost scores 26.7/100 (Grade D), ranked #380 of 417 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage D (1 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 86% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-07-14. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Quick Trust Read

Verdict
Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
26.7/100 · Grade D
Strongest Signal
Maintenance
17.3/20
Weakest Signal
Safety / Integrity
4.3/25
What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Recent Changes
2026-07-14
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #380
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
74.8
Activity Score · out of 100
26.7
HVTrust Score · out of 100
#380
Global Rank · of 417
#31

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage D is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (1 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-07-15 01:30 UTC · Repo last pushed yesterday

Rank Trend

2026-07-14 2026-07-15

Activity & Reach

Stars
3.5k
Forks
343
Last Push
2026-07-14
yesterday
Commits (4 wk)
21
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
23
Rank Change
=
was #380

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions

26.7 / 100 · 50.0% confidence
Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
4.3 / 25
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
8.5 / 17
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
17.3 / 20
Adoption60% stars · 40% downloads, log-scaled
8.5 / 20

Activity Inputs

74.8 / 100
StarsRepository reach
21.3 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
16.7 / 25
CommunityFork signal
11.8 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
Not available
Signed Commits
86%
of last 100 commits verified

Is Laravel Boost safe?

Public trust evidence for Laravel Boost is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Laravel Boost publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Laravel Boost. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Laravel Boost have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for Laravel Boost. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is Laravel Boost actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Laravel Boost use?
Laravel Boost ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Laravel Boost's commits signed?
86% of the last 100 commits to Laravel Boost are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

AI agent surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Implemented
Laravel Boost appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Laravel Boost?

HVTrust scores Laravel Boost from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Listed 1
2026-07-14
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #380

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

HVTrust 26.7 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/laravel-boost.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/laravel-boost)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/laravel-boost"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/laravel-boost.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON