updated 2026-10-18 00:07 UTC

Claude Faf MCP

Repository Website by Wolfe-Jam

Persistent Project Context for Claude — IANA-registered .faf format · Core 14 MCP tools (30 with FAF_TOOLS=all) + 2 prompts · MCP Registry #2759

MCP Servers TypeScript Listed MIT

Is Claude Faf MCP safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 74%
Last push 3d ago
Advisories None known
Compare Claude Faf MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: Claude Faf MCP scores 64.6/100 (Grade C), ranked #525 of 1378 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.3/10; 74% of recent commits are signed; no published advisory affects its latest release (claude-faf-mcp); last pushed 2026-10-15. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Claude Faf MCP could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Already done? Suggest a correctionAdd the trust badge

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Claude Faf MCP and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/Wolfe-Jam/claude-faf-mcp, MIT, last pushed 2026-10-15. 74% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Mixed

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 5.3/10 (scanned Oct 15, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review0
    • Branch Protection3
    • Signed Releases0
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies4
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 3
    CI-Tests 9
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 0
    Contributors 3
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 10
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 10
    Packaging -1
    Pinned-Dependencies 4
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 10
    Signed-Releases 0
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 8

  3. Published packages Linked, not attested

    • npm claude-faf-mcp Source link points back to this repo No build attestation

    Without a build attestation, nothing proves the published files were built from this repository.

  4. What you install today No known advisories

    Latest release checked: claude-faf-mcp 7.0.1. No published advisory affects it (OSV, checked 2026-10-17).

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-08-27 OSSF Scorecard: 5.3/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Claude Faf MCP’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

Signed credential (JSON) How to verify

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How Claude Faf MCP compares in MCP Servers

  1. #293 Korea Stock MCP 64.8 +0.2
  2. #294 GitLab MCP Server 64.6 ±0
  3. #295 Claude Faf MCP 64.6 this agent
  4. #296 Google Workspace MCP 64.5 −0.1
  5. #297 Airtable 64.5 −0.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Claude Faf MCP’s 64.6.

Where the 64.6 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

64.6 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Claude Faf MCP MCP Servers average (781 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
10.3 / 25
in line with avg 10.6
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.8 below avg 13.6
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.0 / 17
0.7 above avg 12.3
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
17.6 / 20
5.4 above avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
6.9 / 20
0.5 below avg 7.4

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-10-15
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → C
2026-10-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#503 → #517)
2026-10-14
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Claude Faf MCP View MCP Servers Report missing data
55.5
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#295
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-10-18 00:07 UTC · Repo last pushed 3 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-17

Activity & Reach

Stars
23
Forks
8
Last Push
2026-10-15
3 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
27
Downloads (7d)
529
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
▲1
was #526

Analysis

Activity Inputs

55.5 / 100
StarsRepository reach
8.3 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.6 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
18.1 / 25
CommunityFork signal
4.4 / 20

Common questions about Claude Faf MCP

Claude Faf MCP has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Claude Faf MCP publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Claude Faf MCP. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Claude Faf MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Claude Faf MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Claude Faf MCP actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 3 day(s).
What license does Claude Faf MCP use?
Claude Faf MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Claude Faf MCP's commits signed?
74% of the last 100 commits to Claude Faf MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Claude Faf MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
medium confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Claude Faf MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-13
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Redis

Maintain Claude Faf MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Claude Faf MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 29Grade 6HVTrust 3Listed 2Scorecard 1Surface 1Delisted 1MCP 1Surface 1
2026-10-15
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → C
2026-10-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#503 → #517)
2026-10-14
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-10-13
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → C
2026-10-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#491 → #507)
2026-10-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#479 → #491)
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#448 → #469)
2026-10-02
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#470 → #458)
2026-09-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 10 spots (#482 → #472)
2026-09-27
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-09-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 14 spots (#497 → #483)
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 300 spots (#783 → #483)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 35.4pts (29.2 → 64.6)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #783
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-15
Rank Moved
Rank rose 20 spots (#500 → #480)
2026-09-13
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Redis
2026-09-13
Rank Moved
Rank rose 62 spots (#557 → #495)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#527 → #537)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 32 spots (#495 → #527)
2026-09-05
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank rose 554 spots (#1040 → #486)
2026-09-05
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 21.1pts (40.6 → 61.7)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#1019 → #1040)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 47 spots (#972 → #1019)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 57 spots (#915 → #972)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 32 spots (#883 → #915)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#858 → #883)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#823 → #858)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 46 spots (#777 → #823)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#747 → #777)
2026-08-27
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 5.3/10
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank rose 323 spots (#1070 → #747)
2026-08-27
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 18.5pts (21.8 → 40.3)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 70 spots (#1000 → #1070)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#999 → #988)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 17 spots (#1014 → #997)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 33 spots (#981 → #1014)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#980 → #990)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 13 spots (#993 → #980)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 55 spots (#939 → #994)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #925
GitHub → Website → npm: claude-faf-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 64.6 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/claude-faf-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/claude-faf-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/claude-faf-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/claude-faf-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON