Flyte
Dynamic, resilient AI orchestration. Coordinate data, models, and compute as you build AI workflows.
Compare Flyte
How does it stack up against its Workflow Platforms neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
Is Flyte safe? Flyte scores 72.3/100 (Grade B), ranked #114 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.9/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-11. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
Ranked neighbours in Workflow Platforms
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Activity & Reach
Analysis
HVTrust Dimensions vs Workflow Platforms
72.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceFlyte Workflow Platforms average (24 agents)
Activity Inputs
86.8 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Is Flyte safe?
Does Flyte publish package provenance?
Does Flyte have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Flyte actively maintained?
What license does Flyte use?
Are Flyte's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
Compare Flyte head-to-head
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to Flyte's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain Flyte?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Flyte from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/flyte)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/flyte"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/flyte.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in Workflow Platforms
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON