RegistryCompare › Flyte vs Trigger.dev

Flyte vs Trigger.dev

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Flyte and Trigger.dev, two Workflow Platforms projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Trigger.dev leads on trust — 90.6/100 (Grade A) vs 67.6/100 (Grade B), a 23.0-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Flyteflyteorg/flyte Trigger.devtriggerdotdev/trigger.dev
HVTrust score 67.6 90.6
Evidence grade B A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #128 #8
Rank in Workflow Platforms #6 #2
GitHub stars 7.2k 15.9k
Last updated today today
Build provenance No Yes
OSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10 7.0 / 10
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Downloads 98k/wk 608k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 12.8 21.2
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.8 14.4
Maintenance / 20 19.9 20.0
Adoption / 20 15.9 17.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared
External providers 3 — OpenAI, Postgres, Redis
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins extensions
Provenance drift Warning Match
Open in the live compare tool → Flyte profile Trigger.dev profile More Workflow Platforms →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →