RegistryCompare › Flyte vs n8n

Flyte vs n8n

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Flyte and n8n, two Workflow Platforms projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

n8n leads on trust — 91.5/100 (Grade A) vs 67.6/100 (Grade B), a 23.9-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Flyteflyteorg/flyte n8nn8n-io/n8n
HVTrust score 67.6 91.5
Evidence grade B A
Coverage grade B A
Overall rank #128 #4
Rank in Workflow Platforms #6 #1
GitHub stars 7.2k 199.3k
Last updated today today
Build provenance No Yes
OSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10 6.6 / 10
License Apache-2.0 NOASSERTION
Downloads 98k/wk 224.2M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 12.8 20.7
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.8 14.1
Maintenance / 20 19.9 20.0
Adoption / 20 15.9 20.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 5 — Anthropic, Browserbase, OpenAI, …
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Warning Match
Open in the live compare tool → Flyte profile n8n profile More Workflow Platforms →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →