RegistryCompare › Flyte vs n8n

Flyte vs n8n

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Flyte and n8n, two Workflow Platforms projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

n8n leads on trust — 89.6/100 (Grade A) vs 72.3/100 (Grade B), a 17.3-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Flyteflyteorg/flyte n8nn8n-io/n8n
HVTrust score 72.3 89.6
Evidence grade B A
Coverage grade B A
Overall rank #109 #15
Rank in Workflow Platforms #6 #2
GitHub stars 7.2k 200.7k
Last updated today today
Build provenance No Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10 5.8 / 10
License Apache-2.0 NOASSERTION
Downloads 98k/wk 224.2M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 12.4 19.8
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.5 13.4
Maintenance / 20 20.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 15.9 20.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 7 — Anthropic, Browserbase, Mistral AI, …
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Unknown Match
Open in the live compare tool → Flyte profile n8n profile More Workflow Platforms →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →